1999
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.4876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which Form of Dopamine Is the Substrate for the Human Dopamine Transporter: the Cationic or the Uncharged Species?

Abstract: The question of which is the active form of dopamine for the neuronal dopamine transporter is addressed in HEK-293 cells expressing the human dopamine transporter. The K m value for [ 3 H]dopamine uptake fell sharply when the pH was increased from 6.0 to 7.4 and then changed less between pH 7.4 and 8.2. The K I for dopamine in inhibiting the cocaine analog [ 3 H]2␤-carbomethoxy-3␤-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane binding displayed an identical pH dependence, suggesting that changes in uptake result from changes in dopa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed in the present experiments that lowering the pH from 7.4 to 7.0 generally affected the binding of [ 3 H]WIN 35,428 more than that of the substrates, in agreement with the same trend seen in our previous work with WIN 35,428 and DA (Berfield et al 1999). The present results also indicated a somewhat greater effect of lowering pH on [ 3 H]WIN 35,428 but not DA binding at 10 mM Na + than at 60-150 mM Na + , indicating the possibility that Na + counteracts H + in the case of WIN 35,428.…”
Section: Methodological Concerns: Tonicitysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…It was observed in the present experiments that lowering the pH from 7.4 to 7.0 generally affected the binding of [ 3 H]WIN 35,428 more than that of the substrates, in agreement with the same trend seen in our previous work with WIN 35,428 and DA (Berfield et al 1999). The present results also indicated a somewhat greater effect of lowering pH on [ 3 H]WIN 35,428 but not DA binding at 10 mM Na + than at 60-150 mM Na + , indicating the possibility that Na + counteracts H + in the case of WIN 35,428.…”
Section: Methodological Concerns: Tonicitysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…33,34 Charged DA is a hydrophilic species 37 and should interact with the outer layer of lipid membrane, as it was generally predicted by Cantor 4 and confirmed by MD simulations. 31 For such solutes C L = γC L 0 , where γ is the asymmetry parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…37 Recent computational studies 31 indicate that the lipid headgroup region is the most probable site for the localization of DA and its precursor, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA). Basing on these results, we suppose that DA/membrane interactions will depend on structure and charge of lipid headgroups.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowering pH in the incubation solution caused a decrease in [ 3 H]DA uptake, probably due to an increase in K m , as demonstrated in HEK-293 cells expressing the human DAT (Berfield et al 1999;Fig. 3).…”
Section: Effect Of Las On Datmentioning
confidence: 90%