Which Dopamine Polymorphisms Are Functional? Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of COMT, DAT, DBH, DDC, DRD1–5, MAOA, MAOB, TH, VMAT1, and VMAT2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many polymorphisms in dopamine genes are reported to affect cognitive, imaging, or clinical phenotypes. It is often inferred or assumed that such associations are causal, mediated by a direct effect of the polymorphism on the gene product itself. However, the supporting evidence is not always clear. METHODS: We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the empirical evidence for functional polymorphisms in genes encoding dopaminergic enzymes (COMT, DBH, DDC, MAOA, MAOB, and TH), dopamine receptors (DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, DRD4, and DRD5), the dopamine transporter (DAT), and vesicular transporters (VMAT1 and VMAT2). We defined functionality as an effect of the polymorphism on the expression, abundance, activity, or affinity of the gene product. RESULTS: We screened 22,728 articles and identified 255 eligible studies. We found robust and medium to large effects for polymorphisms in 4 genes. For catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), the Val 158 Met polymorphism (rs4680) markedly affected enzyme activity, protein abundance, and protein stability. Dopamine b-hydroxylase (DBH) activity was associated with rs1611115, rs2519152, and the DBH-STR polymorphism. Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) activity was associated with a 5 0 VNTR polymorphism. Dopamine D 2 receptor (DRD2) binding was influenced by the Taq1A (rs1800497) polymorphism, and rs1076560 affected DRD2 splicing. CONCLUSIONS: Some widely studied dopaminergic polymorphisms clearly and substantially affect the abundance or activity of the encoded gene product. However, for other polymorphisms, evidence of such an association is negative, inconclusive, or lacking. These findings are relevant when selecting polymorphisms as "markers" of dopamine function, and for interpreting the biological plausibility of associations between these polymorphisms and aspects of brain function or dysfunction.

Distinct roles for dopamine clearance mechanisms in regulating behavioral flexibility

“…The precise mechanism by which COMT regulates reward-driven behavioral flexibility remains unclear, as there were no consistent changes in behavioral strategy or reinforcement learning that emerged from the analyses. However, although acute pharmacological inhibition is different than the chronic changes in enzymatic activity arising from the human COMT Val/Met polymorphism (58), our findings are concordant with reports of increased sensitivity to rewards and faster reinforcement learning in Met allele carriers, who have lower COMT activity than Val allele homozygotes (59,60).…”

Associations between indicators of socioeconomic position and DNA methylation: A systematic review

“…Because the populations, research designs, and DNAm measures varied, we conducted a narrative synthesis, rather than a meta-analysis, of this literature to characterize the heterogeneity of studies and summarize patterns across studies (36, 37). We did not assess risk of publication bias, because most standard systematic review indices evaluating risk of bias are not applicable to the observational study types included here (38).…”

Neural anomalies during vigilance in schizophrenia: Diagnostic specificity and genetic associations

“…Likewise, we acknowledge that the candidate gene concept in schizophrenia has been largely replaced by genome wide association studies—the former has largely failed to yield insights into the genetic basis of schizophrenia ( Collins et al, 2012 , Farrell et al, 2015 ). Critically, COMT polymorphisms appear to be reliably associated with differential higher order processing ( Mier et al, 2010 ), and appear to be a valid marker of dopaminergic function relative to other candidate genes ( Tunbridge et al, 2019 ). In this context, our present findings of differential effects of COMT variation on neural functions related to higher-order processing in individuals with liability for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are interesting, though must be interpreted with caution.…”