1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which components of diet quality affect retention time of digesta in seabirds?

Abstract: 1. The nature of the diet can affect the gut retention time of food consumed by an animal, and a theoretical framework has been developed to explain this in terms of optimal digestion rates. However, diets may differ in a number of different attributes, all of which may separately affect the optimal length of time that they are retained in the gut. 2. Here an attempt is made to elucidate which of these features are important in determining gut retention time of different fish species when fed to nine north At… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, differential nutritional quality requirements of chicks may influence prey segregation between parents and offspring. Diet quality refers to several separately operating factors such as digestion time and nutritive value (Massias & Becker 1990, Hilton et al 1998. Firstly, it is known that retention times of digesta of fish are typically shorter than those of squid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, differential nutritional quality requirements of chicks may influence prey segregation between parents and offspring. Diet quality refers to several separately operating factors such as digestion time and nutritive value (Massias & Becker 1990, Hilton et al 1998. Firstly, it is known that retention times of digesta of fish are typically shorter than those of squid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean retention time (MRT ) in the gut from mouth to anus was calculated as (4) where E i is the mass of excreta produced during the collection period i, t i is time since the trial feeding, and n is the number of collections (Jackson 1992, Hilton et al 2000. Absolute values of MRT can depend on how long sampling is continued beyond the time when most of a meal has been excreted (Hilton et al 1998). To ensure that this variation did not affect tests between Nuculana radiata and Macoma calcarea, MRT was compared between species for total collection durations of 12, 18, and 24 h after feeding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prey detected in scat samples is likely to reflect the most recent meal consumed by albatross, which is similar to stomach contents analysis. The digestion rates of seabirds are influenced by numerous variables, such as predator species, metabolic rate, meal size, food type, and feeding frequency (Hilton et al, 1998). In sooty albatross (Phoebetria fusca), the mean retention rate of prey ranged from 11 to 15 h, however some prey was still detected up to 50 h after eating (Jackson, 1992).…”
Section: Study Sites and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%