Which Combinations of Techniques and Modes of Delivery in Internet-Based Interventions Effectively Change Health Behavior? A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundMany online interventions designed to promote health behaviors combine multiple behavior change techniques (BCTs), adopt different modes of delivery (MoD) (eg, text messages), and range in how usable they are. Research is therefore needed to examine the impact of these features on the effectiveness of online interventions.ObjectiveThis study applies Classification and Regression Trees (CART) analysis to meta-analytic data, in order to identify synergistic effects of BCTs, MoDs, and usability factors.MethodsWe analyzed data from Webb et al. This review included effect sizes from 52 online interventions targeting a variety of health behaviors and coded the use of 40 BCTs and 11 MoDs. Our research also developed a taxonomy for coding the usability of interventions. Meta-CART analyses were performed using the BCTs and MoDs as predictors and using treatment success (ie, effect size) as the outcome.ResultsFactors related to usability of the interventions influenced their efficacy. Specifically, subgroup analyses indicated that more efficient interventions (interventions that take little time to understand and use) are more likely to be effective than less efficient interventions. Meta-CART identified one synergistic effect: Interventions that included barrier identification/ problem solving and provided rewards for behavior change reported an average effect size that was smaller (ḡ=0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.44) than interventions that used other combinations of techniques (ḡ=0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.59). No synergistic effects were found for MoDs or for MoDs combined with BCTs.ConclusionsInterventions that take little time to understand and use were more effective than those that require more time. Few specific combinations of BCTs that contribute to the effectiveness of online interventions were found. Furthermore, no synergistic effects between BCTs and MoDs were found, even though MoDs had strong effects when analyzed univariately in the original study.

Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review

“…This rapid decline in usage concurs with qualitative research showing that people often lack commitment to using any particular app and they tend to engage in only transient, casual app use [60]. Since participant engagement determines intervention exposure, and level of intervention exposure determines intervention efficacy [28, 61, 74], better understanding of factors that improve participant engagement and retention is needed.…”

The Impact of Public Health Awareness Campaigns on the Awareness and Quality of Palliative Care

“…Little is understood about these factors or to what extent any changes observed are sustained, 18,25 although simple interventions that are easy and quick to use appear to be more effective at changing behavior. 26 Social media has the potential to increase engagement with healthcare issues and enable debate and discussion, as well as create virtual social networks. 27 However, there may be unintended consequences and risks.…”

Health Behavior Change for Obesity Management

“…internet, SMS) had larger effects on health-related behaviors [13]. The only published meta-analysis looking at the interactions between BCTs and MoDs in digital interventions did not find significant effects [48]. Research focusing on the development of strategies for sustained engagement alongside with health behavior change theory is also a priority for digital interventions [49].…”