2022
DOI: 10.5114/pedm.2022.113741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which C-peptide assay do you use? Increasing need for describing C-peptide assay performance

Abstract: Many C-peptide assays are commercially available for research and routine use. However, not all assays yield consistent results, especially in the low concentration ranges. We searched the literature describing C-peptide measurements to assess which assays are mainly used in the diabetes research field and if they are specified. Percentages of publications on C-peptide measurements in type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D) and other forms of diabetes were 32%, 54% and 14%, respectively. In only 54% of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many different commercially available C-peptide assays are used for research and routine analysis, but not all assays are suitable for measurements in the lower picomolar range and those which are not equally sensitive. 45 Samples from the cohort (only from one centre) were first used to compare and verify the ultrasensitive Mercodia enzyme-linked immunosorbent C-peptide assay (ELISA) with the Beckman immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for C-peptide. Reproducibility (coefficient of variation), limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation were compared.…”
Section: Findings To Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different commercially available C-peptide assays are used for research and routine analysis, but not all assays are suitable for measurements in the lower picomolar range and those which are not equally sensitive. 45 Samples from the cohort (only from one centre) were first used to compare and verify the ultrasensitive Mercodia enzyme-linked immunosorbent C-peptide assay (ELISA) with the Beckman immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for C-peptide. Reproducibility (coefficient of variation), limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation were compared.…”
Section: Findings To Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many C-peptide assays are commercially available for research and routine use. 35 We compared the ultrasensitive Mercodia enzyme-linked immunosorbent C-peptide assay (ELISA) with the Beckman immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for C-peptide, assessing reproducibility (coefficient of variation [CV]), limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ). 20 Because only the IRMA met the specifications claimed by the manufacturer, providing the lowest threshold for quantification of serum C-peptide, we chose this assay for our C-peptide analyses.…”
Section: C-peptide Assay Validation and Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cela pose, bien entendu, un problème, en particulier dans les travaux de recherche concernant le DT1, lorsque les résultats doivent être confrontés entre les études. 9 Il existe également des aspects précis quant à la façon de prélever le plasma pour doser le peptide-C de manière à conserver sa stabilité, mais ces considérations dépassent le cadre de cet article. 10 Dans l'étude DCCT, la limite maximale de peptide-C plasmatique pour être inclus dans le protocole (au début des années 80) était de 500 pmol/l après stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified