2017
DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wherein the Authors Attempt to Minimize the Confusion Generated by Their Study “Breast Cancer Mortality after a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ” by Several Commentators Who Disagree with Them and a Few Who Don’t: A Qualitative Study

Abstract: -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, preventing the invasive in-breast recurrence after DCIS did not result in fewer deaths—therefore, the recurrence is not a primary invasive cancer—therefore, the DCIS has inherent malignant potential. Our position here has not been widely accepted—most commentators continue to describe DCIS as a precursor lesion with little or no inherent malignant potential [ 43 ].…”
Section: Part 2: the Seer Study: Mortality After Dcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, preventing the invasive in-breast recurrence after DCIS did not result in fewer deaths—therefore, the recurrence is not a primary invasive cancer—therefore, the DCIS has inherent malignant potential. Our position here has not been widely accepted—most commentators continue to describe DCIS as a precursor lesion with little or no inherent malignant potential [ 43 ].…”
Section: Part 2: the Seer Study: Mortality After Dcismentioning
confidence: 99%