Where to for Australian mental health services? Promoting self-efficacy

Castle, David

doi:10.1177/0004867413494484

Cited by 15 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Optimization of services requires increased expenditure (Castle, 2013;Harris & Boyce, 2013). Unfortunately, when additional funding has been announced by governmental agencies across the region, there is often only a "trickle to mainstream services" (Castle, 2013). Despite this, there is growing evidence of the cost effectiveness of psychiatric rehabilitation (Raykar, Nigam, & Chisholm, 2016).…”

Section: Theme: Policies Legislation and Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Informed decision making is achievable, with increasing recognition among public and policy makers that schizophrenia is burdensome (Chong et al, 2016). This results in better resource allocation and the development of policyoriented research for people living with SMI (Chong et al, 2016). Castle (2013 argues that while we should continue to lobby for additional resources, more acutely, we need to focus on "what can be done with what we have" that, rather than being reliant on prominent individuals for advocacy, professional bodies and consumer and carer organizations need to coordinate and be advocates for change (Castle, 2013).…”

Section: Theme: Policies Legislation and Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A structured review of psychiatric rehabilitation for individuals living with severe mental illness within three regions of the Asia‐Pacific: Implications for practice and policy

Hill

Killaspy

Padmavati

et al. 2019

Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Psychiatric rehabilitation can provide and support recovery‐oriented care by assisting individuals living with severe mental illness to lead full lives. Despite a well‐established evidence‐base, implementation and access to these interventions in clinical practice for people with severe mental illness in the Asia‐Pacific region is low. We therefore aimed to evaluate prominent themes impacting on clinical practice, policy, and the implementation of psychiatric rehabilitation across the Asia‐Pacific region. Methods A comprehensive review of relevant literature on psychiatric rehabilitation of three regions within the Asia‐Pacific was conducted using a structured search of PubMed and other databases. Eligible articles were selected which focussed on how psychiatric rehabilitation is defined and implemented across the Asia‐Pacific region, as well as the associated successes and challenges. Common themes were generated. Results Six themes emerged: the impact of policy, legislation, and human rights; access difficulties; the important role of family; the significance of culture, religion, and spiritual beliefs; the widespread impact of stigma; and the indigenous models of excellence being developed. Discussion Consideration of the six themes and their implications should help raise awareness of the issues involved in the provision of psychiatric rehabilitation in the Asia‐Pacific region and may improve outcomes for people living with severe mental illness. Suggested strategies include: developing a shared understanding of psychiatric rehabilitation; establishing quality legislation that's well implemented; adapting evidence‐based models to develop culturally appropriate services; implementing stigma reduction and empowerment‐based interventions; and, ensuring coordinated action among all stakeholders, combined with effective leadership.

show abstract

Section: Theme: Policies Legislation and Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theme: Policies Legislation and Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A structured review of psychiatric rehabilitation for individuals living with severe mental illness within three regions of the Asia‐Pacific: Implications for practice and policy

Hill

Killaspy

Padmavati

et al. 2019

Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ideally, health advocacy would be built upon strong partnerships between peak professional groups such as the College and the AMA (Castle, 2013). In political terms, the AMA clearly has the national profile and the capacity to lead debates around health funding, as seen in the media after the 2014 Federal Budget.…”

Section: Viewpointmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health advocacy and the funding of mental health services reform

Allison

Nance

Bastiampillai

et al. 2014

Aust N Z J Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The first Viewpoint, by Castle (2013), focuses on services for people with severe mental disorders. He argues that the foundations of the current system of care are fundamentally sound, but identifies a number of deficits: the current system does not serve people with cross-sector issues well (e.g.…”

Section: Promoting Recovery and Self-efficacymentioning

confidence: 99%