Background
Several different hemoclips are marketed for endoscopic hemostasis of non-variceal upper GI bleeding. No prior reports have compared success rates of clip deployment onto bases of chronic gastric ulcers (GU's), clip retention rates, or their influence on ulcer healing.
Objectives
For treatment of chronic GU's, to compare 3 different hemoclips with multipolar coagulation (MPEC) and control.
Design
Randomized controlled study.
Subjects
7 adult dogs with prehepatic portal hypertension had GU's created by rubber band ligation. Animals had oral proton pump inhibitors daily and weekly endoscopies to quantitate clip retention and ulcer healing.
Interventions
1 week after banding, 10 chronic ulcers were randomized in pairs to control (no endoscopic treatment), MPEC, or different hemoclips (Olympus-“QuickClip2”-QC; Wilson Cook-“TriClip”-TC; or Boston Scientific Corp-“Resolution Clip”-RC).
Main Outcome Measurements
Times and success of hemoclip deployment, clip retention rates, and ulcer healing rates on weekly endoscopies.
Results
Success rates of clip deployment were 100% for RC, 93.1% for TC to 83.3% for QC. Clip retention rates were significantly higher with RC clips than QC or TC at 1 to 3 weeks. Retained clips did not delay GU healing compared with MPEC or control.
Conclusions
1) Hemoclipping time was similar with all three, 2) RC clips were retained significantly longer than QC or TC, 3) Hemoclips did not delay ulcer healing compared to control or MPEC, and 4) All 3 hemoclips were safe and no complications such as bleeding or weight loss were noted.