Where have all the mosquito nets gone? Spatial modelling reveals mosquito net distributions across Tanzania do not target optimal Anopheles mosquito habitats

Abstract

BackgroundMalaria remains the deadliest vector-borne disease despite long-term, costly control efforts. The United Republic of Tanzania has implemented countrywide anti-malarial interventions over more than a decade, including national insecticide-treated net (ITN) rollouts and subsequent monitoring. While previous analyses have compared spatial variation in malaria endemicity with ITN distributions, no study has yet compared Anopheles habitat suitability to determine proper allocation of ITNs. This study assesses where mosquitoes were most likely to thrive before implementation of large-scale ITN interventions in Tanzania and determine if ITN distributions successfully targeted those areas.MethodsUsing Maxent, a species distribution model was constructed relating anopheline mosquito occurrences for 1999–2003 to high resolution environmental observations. A 2011–2012 layer of mosquito net ownership was created using georeferenced data across Tanzania from the Demographic and Health Surveys. The baseline mosquito habitat suitability was compared to subsequent ITN ownership using (1) the average ITN numbers per house and (2) the proportion of households with ≥1 net to test whether national ITN ownership targets have been met and have tracked malaria risk.ResultsElevation, land cover, and human population distribution outperformed variants of temperature and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in anopheline distribution models. The spatial distribution of ITN ownership across Tanzania was near-random spatially (Moran’s I = 0.07). Householders reported owning 2.488 ITNs on average and 93.41 % of households had ≥1 ITN. Mosquito habitat suitability was statistically unrelated to reported ITN ownership and very weakly to the proportion of households with ≥1 ITN (R2 = 0.051). Proportional ITN ownership/household varied relative to mosquito habitat suitability (Levene’s test F = 3.0037). Quantile regression was used to assess trends in ITN ownership among households with the highest and lowest 10 % of ITN ownership. ITN ownership declined significantly toward areas with the highest vector habitat suitability among households with lowest ITN ownership (t = −3.38). In areas with lowest habitat suitability, ITN ownership was consistently higher.ConclusionsInsecticide-treated net ownership is critical for malaria control. While Tanzania-wide efforts to distribute ITNs has reduced malaria impacts, gaps and variance in ITN ownership are unexpectedly large in areas where malaria risk is highest. Supplemental ITN distributions targeting prime Anopheles habitats are likely to have disproportionate human health benefits.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0841-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

First report on molecular identification of Eimeria sp. from captive forest musk deer

“…Regional factors seem to have an impact on the epidemiology of parasitic diseases, which can be attributed to geographical location and climatic conditions [36,37]. The altitude of Maoxian, Lixian and Ma'erkang was higher than that of other areas.…”

Maximum Entropy Ecological Niche Prediction of the Current Potential Geographical Distribution of <i>Eimeria</i> Species of Cattle, Sheep and Goats in Mexico

“…It would be a mistake to see the current study as definitive, as one major limitation was that our findings did not include information to support or reject macroecological patterns related to parasite distribution. It is well understood that spatial distribution of parasites is influenced by abiotic and biotic environments, such as temperature, precipitation, altitude, presence of predators, human disturbance, geographic barriers, soil type and vegetation among other factors [36] [37]. In fact, previous studies suggest that biotic factors will be more relevant at a species equatorial range limit; whereas abiotic factors will influence the high latitude or poleward limit [21].…”

10 Years of Environmental Change on the Slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro and Its Associated Shift in Malaria Vector Distributions

“…The role of vector control interventions could not be directly evaluated in the models due to data limitations; available data on LLIN coverage reflect only a limited geographic sample from prior targeted studies, which are conducted at different time points, or from national surveys designed to estimate district- or regional-level LLIN coverage indices (50), which biases finer-scale analyses. Nonetheless, previous studies in this region of northern Tanzania have found similar rates of bednet ownership in villages situated at low (750 m) and mid-altitudes (1,050 m) (51), therefore, the impact of interventions would likely be similar across the study area.…”