Where harm reduction meets housing first: Exploring alcohol's role in a project-based housing first setting

Abstract

Background Housing first (HF) programmes provide low-barrier, nonabstinence-based, immediate, supportive and permanent housing to chronically homeless people who often have co-occurring substance-use and/or psychiatric disorders. Project-based HF programmes offer housing in the form of individual units within a larger housing project. Recent studies conducted at a specific project-based HF programme that serves chronically homeless individuals with alcohol problems found housing provision was associated with reduced publicly funded service utilisation, decreased alcohol use, and sizable cost offsets. No studies to date, however, have qualitatively explored the role of alcohol use in the lives of residents in project-based HF. Methods We collected data in a project-based HF setting via naturalistic observation of verbal exchanges between staff and residents, field notes taken during staff rounds, and audio recorded staff focus groups and resident interview sessions. Qualitative data were managed and coded using a constant comparative process consistent with grounded theory methodology. The goal of the analysis was to generate a conceptual/thematic description of alcohol’s role in residents’ lives. Results Findings suggest it is important to take into account residents’ motivations for alcohol use, which may include perceived positive and negative consequences. Further, a harm reduction approach was reported to facilitate housing attainment and maintenance. Residents and staff reported that traditional, abstinence-based approaches are neither desirable nor effective for this specific population. Finally, elements of the moral model of alcohol dependence continue to pervade both residents’ views of themselves and the community’s perceptions of them. Conclusions Findings suggest it is necessary to set aside traditional models of alcohol use and approaches to better understand, align with, and address this population’s needs. In doing so, we might gain further insights into how to enhance the existing project-based HF approach by applying more tailored, alcohol-specific, harm reduction interventions.

“This place has given me a reason to care”: Understanding ‘managed alcohol programs’ as enabling places in Canada

“…Only a handful of such studies have been undertaken. For example, Collins et al, 2012b found that alcohol consumption played a multifaceted role in the lives of residents living in the Seattle program. From the point of view of residents interviewed, the benefits of living in the program included avoiding withdrawal and feeling part of a supportive local community.…”

Transitioning from Homelessness: A “Fresh-Start” Event

“…On the other hand, having to negotiate social relationships that are made complicated when one person has housing while others still live on the streets could be challenging. The question of location also highlights differences in approaches to HF that use either a single-site housing model with limited choice in location (Collins et al, 2011) or a scatter-site model that offers more choice of location (Tsemberis et al, 2004). In this case, consumers did not have choice of their new neighborhood given a single-site approach.…”

Project VOGUE: A Partnership for Increasing HIV Knowledge and HIV Vaccine Trial Awareness Among House Ball Leaders in Western New York

“…To address HIV alone would entail missing many of the social determinants of health that lead to high HIV incidence in the population (MacKellar et al, 2005; Phillips et al, 2011). It is essential that HIV prevention efforts in the HBC include providing resources and/or linkages to resources that provide general education, employment training and assistance, substance abuse programs, housing assistance, as well as mental health services (Collins et al, 2012; Dworkin et al, 2008; Lehavot et al, 2011). To this end, partnerships with various CBOs are essential, as such entities can help to address the various needs of the community in question and to ensure sustainability beyond academic funding and research grants.…”