“…The article is a landmark publication that fits well with the mission of Stress and Health (Probst & Hagger, ) as it integrates one of the leading theories of stress with current theoretical approaches to resilience, provides an evidence‐base for the integration, moves thinking forward by proposing some clear testable hypotheses in the field and sets out an agenda for future research. As a researcher interested in the role of self‐regulation (Hagger, ) within models of motivation (e.g., Chatzisarantis, Hagger, & Brickell, ; Hagger & Chatzisarantis, ) and social cognition (e.g., Chatzisarantis, Hagger, & Smith, ; Hagger, Anderson, Kyriakaki, & Darkings, ; Hagger & Chatzisarantis, ; Hagger, Chatzisarantis, et al, ; Hagger & Luszczynska, ; Head & Noar, ; Noar & Head, ; Sniehotta, Presseau, & Araújo‐Soares, ), and its effects on promoting good health and minimizing ill health (Hagger, , ), including the maladaptive effects of stress‐related health outcomes (Hagger, , ), I saw important parallels in the theoretical tenets of COR theory outlined in Chen et al's () review and current theoretical models of self‐regulation. In this editorial, I will take the opportunity to briefly outline the conceptual overlaps and commonalities between COR theory and a leading model of self‐regulation that has received a lot of attention in the social psychological, health and stress literature: the strength or limited‐resource model of self‐control (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, & Tice, ; Baumeister, Vohs, & Tice, ; Hagger, Wood, Stiff, & Chatzisarantis, , , ).…”