2017
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201700940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where Does Electron Correlation Lie? Some Answers from a Real Space Partition

Abstract: We discuss an intra- and interatomic partition of the electron correlation energy (E ) within the interacting quantum atoms (IQA) approach at the accurate coupled cluster level with single, double, and estimated triple excitations (CCSDT(T)). This division offers a privileged window into the spatial localization of this component of the molecular energy. We show that the total molecular E is dominated by the intra-atomic or intra-fragment terms and that interatomic contributions change smoothly from short- to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a physical explanation for this observation: while only employing the Hartree-Fock field, only Fermi correlation is considered (the Fermi hole [58] follows the electron and exclude same-spin electrons), which means that there is no correlation between electrons with opposite spin states. When Møller-Plesset perturbation is applied, Coulomb correlation becomes present in the system, and opposite-spin electrons are no longer independent [59]. This fact will cause repulsion between electrons, especially in covalent multiple bonds of low polarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a physical explanation for this observation: while only employing the Hartree-Fock field, only Fermi correlation is considered (the Fermi hole [58] follows the electron and exclude same-spin electrons), which means that there is no correlation between electrons with opposite spin states. When Møller-Plesset perturbation is applied, Coulomb correlation becomes present in the system, and opposite-spin electrons are no longer independent [59]. This fact will cause repulsion between electrons, especially in covalent multiple bonds of low polarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be pointed out that there are some instances in which bond correlation can be negative, as we reported elsewhere [2] for some ionic bonds and most notably hydrides. In fact, Pendás et al [15] also reported the negative exchange-correlation components in the hydride BH 3 , justifying this observation by the poor Hartree-Fock description of the hydride-like atomic volume. The sign of the bond correlation energy is an indication of bond polarity: low polarity bonds have large positive bond correlation energies (the electronic density is concentrated at the interatomic region) because high polarity bonds have small or even negative bond correlations (the electronic density is concentrated at the atomic basins).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This capability was lacking for 10 years but was finally made possible through our work and our unique software. Furthermore, Pendás et al [15] also carried out an IQA electron correlation analysis of several systems, but they used CCSD(T) densities. In the paper, a quick comparison between MP2 and CCSD(T) densities shows that the use of the unrelaxed MP2 densities can result in incomplete descriptions of the kinetic and electrostatic terms in the IQA partition, especially when compared to the relaxed CCSD(T) densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the six H–H pairs has an exchange‐correlation driven ISBE of about 5 kcal mol −1 . We have argued that these nonbonded terms are the short‐range remnants of long‐range dispersion . If we do not recognize these 1,3 secondary interactions and insist on assigning this stabilization to the chemical C−H bonds, then each C−H bond energy would acquire an extra (6×4.8)/4=7.2 kcal mol −1 stabilization energy.…”
Section: Theory and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%