Where Did the Bureaucrats Go? Role and Influence of the Public Bureaucracy in the Swedish and French Pension Reform Debate

Abstract

This article has two key objectives. First, despite having been considered as a key element to favor the expansion and elaboration of the welfare state in industrial countries, bureaucrats have been largely ignored by the “New” Politics of the Welfare State. This article demonstrates that bureaucrats still matter in times of retrenchment, because they can facilitate or obstruct various phases of the policy process. The degree of independence of the bureaucracy vis‐à‐vis the government, the government's level of dependency and trust on public expertise, the locus of ministerial power, and political deadlocks contribute to either accentuate or decrease the influence of the bureaucracy in the retrenchment of social policies. Second, these elements are analyzed via a comparison of the pension reform processes in France and Sweden. This article argues that the French bureaucracy, despite its high degree of centralization and powers, has been far less successful than its Swedish counterpart. The Swedish institutional structure, the predominance of social ministries in pension affairs, and the trust given to an independent agency account for this puzzling outcome.

Bringing the bureaucrats back in: neo-liberal tax reform in New Zealand

“…This speaks to a growing body of literature which argues that the state as actor has been forgotten for way too long and needs to be brought back into analyses of economic and social policy (Marier, 2005;Levy, 2006;Schmidt, 2009). This speaks to a growing body of literature which argues that the state as actor has been forgotten for way too long and needs to be brought back into analyses of economic and social policy (Marier, 2005;Levy, 2006;Schmidt, 2009).…”

“…A central theme in the bureaucracy literature is that the power of public officials in policy-making is a function of expertise (Heclo, 1974;Boston, 1989Boston, , 1992Marier, 2005;Peters, 2010). A central theme in the bureaucracy literature is that the power of public officials in policy-making is a function of expertise (Heclo, 1974;Boston, 1989Boston, , 1992Marier, 2005;Peters, 2010).…”

Who takes the hit? Ministerial advisers and the distribution of welfare state cuts

“…After all, the welfare systems have grown more complex with time, making the need for expert advice even more crucial. (For a critique of the lack of analysis of bureaucracy's influence on welfare state retrenchment, see Marier 2005).…”

Immigration, Bureaucracies and Policy Formulation: The Case of Quebec

“…Carpenter, ; Nicholson‐Crotty and Miller, ; Palus and Yackee, ). Moreover, the political demands for bureaucratic input and the potential that bureaucratic policy formulation can be used to bypass political deadlocks have long been documented (Marier, ).…”