Where can social learning be improved in international river basin management in Europe?

Abstract

In recent years, collaborative planning and processes of social learning (SL) have gained increasingly in interest in river basin management. In this paper, we fi rst summarize the prerequisites for SL to take place in collaborative management processes. These are openness, gains and incentives, and a perceived pressure to learn. We then study the European situation subsequent to the introduction of the European Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC; WFD) as an example. Based on an analysis of policy documents, a case study of the Elbe river basin and an elaboration of concepts related to theories of international regimes, we conclude that the conditions for SL are often not met if management processes are highly formalised. Considering SL that is necessary for innovation and change, this can best be supported through the establishment of parallel "learning processes", such as the Common Implementation Strategy that accompanies implementation of the WFD at European level. Copyright

Using framing parameters to improve handling of uncertainties in water management practice

“…Troja (2000) points to the importance of a mediated process when engaging in processes of reframing. In such a process social learning is enabled which is considered as crucial for water management to perform well over the long run (Pahl-Wostl et al, 2007;Borowski and Pahl-Wostl, 2008). In this we judge it as a promising sign that communication plays an important role in both case studies as the main strategy to deal with issues of framing differences due to multiple knowledge frames as well as to ensure and maintain trust among actors.…”

Coordination and Participation Boards under the European Water Framework Directive: Different Approaches Used in Some EU Countries

“…For instance, participatory planning is supposed to improve the quality of river basin planning, as expert-based and local knowledge are included in the decision-making processes, as well as to increase social acceptance towards decisions that should, in turn, facilitate implementation. Moreover, public participation should increase public awareness and the ownership of environmental problems [19] and facilitate a process of mutual understanding among parties as well as social learning [3,20,21].…”

Combining backcasting and adaptive management for climate adaptation in coastal regions: A methodology and a South African case study

“…Another type of uncertainty is a lack of knowledge due to limited availability and variability of data. AM accounts for these instances of uncertainty, by assuming a persistent lack of knowledge on how the different parts of the system interact, how the system works and how it will change in the course of time [70].…”

“…Monitoring thus supports the whole process of policy development to remain reflexive. That is, to be prepared to question and continuously update policy goals -policy appraisal process [10,70,126], cf. [61][62][63] have developed the following set of criteria against which the degree of reflexive management can be assessed 15 :…”