2021
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where are randomized trials necessary: Are smoking and parachutes good counterexamples?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of when a randomized trial is needed has been recently debated ( 46 ). Indeed, precisely when a randomized trial is necessary is not entirely clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The concept of when a randomized trial is needed has been recently debated ( 46 ). Indeed, precisely when a randomized trial is necessary is not entirely clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There does not seem to be robust consensus on this issue. One proposal has been that a trial may be needed when an intervention is thought to be beneficial by physicians, but offers only modest benefit with the potential for harm ( 46 ). Another indication would be when a standard of care is debated, or poorly understood, early or mid-phase randomized trials provide an important strategy to identify an optimal approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RCTs are considered the gold standard of medical evidence, gaining popularity in the mid to late twentieth century due to their ability to minimize confounding, solve problems related to time zero (e.g., guarantee time), and limit multiple hypothesis testing [ 2 , 3 ]. RCTs are particularly useful in biomedicine, where the size of treatment effects are often modest, and interventions are typically delivered at the individual level (with limited clustering or spillover effects) and with the expectation that they will benefit the participant.…”
Section: The Parachute Analogy In Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 99%