2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-54332-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whence Long-Distance Indefinite Readings? Solving Chierchia’s Puzzle with Dependent Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dependent type theoretical frameworks (Martin-Löf 1975;Martin-Löf and Sambin 1984;Makkai 1995) have been used to model linguistic phenomena of central importance, e.g., unbound anaphora (Ranta 1994;Fernando 2001;Cooper 2004;Grudzińska and Zawadowski 2014;Bekki 2014), lexical phenomena such as selectional restrictions and coercions (Asher 2011;Luo 2012;Chatzikyriakidis and Luo 2017b), adjectival and adverbial modification (Chatzikyriakidis and Luo 2017a) and long-distance indefinites (Grudzińska and Zawadowski 2017d). This paper argues that the three puzzling readings (inversely linked interpretations, weak definite readings in possessives and Haddock-type readings) provide another compelling example of application of dependent types to the study of natural language semantics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependent type theoretical frameworks (Martin-Löf 1975;Martin-Löf and Sambin 1984;Makkai 1995) have been used to model linguistic phenomena of central importance, e.g., unbound anaphora (Ranta 1994;Fernando 2001;Cooper 2004;Grudzińska and Zawadowski 2014;Bekki 2014), lexical phenomena such as selectional restrictions and coercions (Asher 2011;Luo 2012;Chatzikyriakidis and Luo 2017b), adjectival and adverbial modification (Chatzikyriakidis and Luo 2017a) and long-distance indefinites (Grudzińska and Zawadowski 2017d). This paper argues that the three puzzling readings (inversely linked interpretations, weak definite readings in possessives and Haddock-type readings) provide another compelling example of application of dependent types to the study of natural language semantics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%