2012
DOI: 10.1177/875687051203100404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When you can't Get There: Using Video Self-Monitoring as a Tool for Changing the Behaviors of Pre-Service Teachers

Abstract: Supervisors are sometimes assigned to pre-service teachers who are placed in far-away schools, often in rural districts. It can be difficult or impossible for supervisors to observe these teachers enough, or perhaps at all, because of the distance. This article describes a single-subject case study that was conducted with two pre-service teachers in which they used video self-monitoring with guidance from their university supervisor to change a teaching behavior. Results showed that the process was effective i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One intern required prompting prior to SM condition, and with prompting demonstrated a functional relation between the intervention and an increase in BSP. The results of this study support the use of an SM intervention including PF and GS as a promising way to increase the use of BSP with pre-service teachers, and is consistent with previous literature in the field (Alexander et al, 2012; Hager, 2012; Keller et al, 2005). This study further contributes to the SM knowledge base by demonstrating effects with teacher interns in masked conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One intern required prompting prior to SM condition, and with prompting demonstrated a functional relation between the intervention and an increase in BSP. The results of this study support the use of an SM intervention including PF and GS as a promising way to increase the use of BSP with pre-service teachers, and is consistent with previous literature in the field (Alexander et al, 2012; Hager, 2012; Keller et al, 2005). This study further contributes to the SM knowledge base by demonstrating effects with teacher interns in masked conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite some unknowns about why the process works, SM is a well-documented and effective intervention to change teacher behavior with classroom management practices (Rispoli et al, 2017). Participants with reported positive outcomes have included pre-service teachers (Alexander et al, 2012; Hager, 2012; Keller et al, 2005), novice teachers (Briere et al, 2015; Kalis et al, 2007), middle school teachers (Simonsen et al, 2013), and teaching assistants (Pinkelman & Horner, 2017; Seligson-Petscher & Bailey, 2006). Students’ outcomes have been less commonly reported, but have ranged broadly from high school students with emotional and behavioral disorders (Kalis et al, 2007) to students with developmental disabilities in elementary self-contained classrooms (Keller et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coaching (including self-monitoring as a form of self-coaching) procedures were utilized at varying frequencies. The majority of studies with this component provided daily feedback ( k = 34, 70.00%; e.g., Alexander, Williams, & Nelson, 2012; Houghton et al, 1990). Other studies provided feedback once per week ( k = 10, 20.00%; e.g., Capizzi et al, 2010; Pisacreta, Tincani, Connell, & Axelrod, 2011) and multiple times ( k = 5, 10.00%; e.g., Morgan et al, 1994; Wright et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined coaching as any ongoing support to increase or maintain teachers’ use of BSP. Based on this definition, we included studies that involved both ongoing performance feedback in person (e.g., Smith, Lewis, & Stormont, 2011), via email (e.g., Barton et al, 2016), or self-delivered (e.g., Alexander, Williams, & Nelson, 2012). Below we highlight notable findings related to the descriptive characteristics, methodological QIs, and evaluation of the practice, as well as discuss limitations and future directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%