2020
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When, Who, and How to Sample: Designing Practical Surveillance for 7 Neglected Tropical Diseases as We Approach Elimination

Abstract: As neglected tropical disease programs look to consolidate the successes of moving towards elimination, we need to understand the dynamics of transmission at low prevalence to inform surveillance strategies for detecting elimination and resurgence. In this special collection, modelling insights are used to highlight drivers of local elimination, evaluate strategies for detecting resurgence, and show the importance of rational spatial sampling schemes for several neglected tropical diseases (specifically schist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, according to WHO, once interruption of transmission is close or has been achieved, affected countries will need to implement a surveillance system “to detect and respond to resurgence of transmission and to prevent reintroduction from regions where the disease is still endemic” [ 4 ]. Despite these recommendations, specific guidance and thresholds on when, where and how to adapt intervention strategies in near-to-elimination settings is yet to be developed [ 11 , 12 , 15 ]. More evidence on the feasibility, impact, effectiveness and sustainability of multi-pronged intervention approaches needs to be generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, according to WHO, once interruption of transmission is close or has been achieved, affected countries will need to implement a surveillance system “to detect and respond to resurgence of transmission and to prevent reintroduction from regions where the disease is still endemic” [ 4 ]. Despite these recommendations, specific guidance and thresholds on when, where and how to adapt intervention strategies in near-to-elimination settings is yet to be developed [ 11 , 12 , 15 ]. More evidence on the feasibility, impact, effectiveness and sustainability of multi-pronged intervention approaches needs to be generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As programs move toward elimination, maximizing information given limited resources will aid in targeting treatment and identifying possible areas of resurgence. Who and when to sample in survey design should be informed by the duration of infectiousness and whether there are high-risk groups [ 9 ]. Research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of potential alternative surveillance strategies.…”
Section: Survey Design and Statistical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent history of renewed investment and strengthened public–private partnerships [ 3 ], combined with calls for enhanced integration [ 4 ], have regalvanized IDM programs globally. Task-shifting of case identification and management closer to affected communities, coupled with training of and motivation for healthcare workers, strengthened reporting, better diagnostics and treatments, and innovative active case finding strategies, are all likely to play pivotal roles if elimination goals are to be successfully achieved.…”
Section: What Does Elimination Mean In the Context Of Ntds?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outlier areas and population groups become more prominent for transmission and potentially harder to find, and larger samples over broader areas are required to confirm trends [ 2 ]. Consequently, determining the optimal design of stand-alone and integrated surveillance approaches both during program implementation and prior to verification of elimination has been an urgent priority [ 3 ]. Once programs reach elimination targets, however, there is little consensus or guidance on how best to maintain effective surveillance [ 4 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%