1999
DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
621
0
13

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 703 publications
(675 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(29 reference statements)
34
621
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, students who were more strongly identified with the school and who held stereotyped beliefs about the academic domains emphasized at the school may have been more negatively impacted by their stereotypical beliefs than students who were less strongly identified with the school. This finding parallels other research on the importance of domain identification on performance, such as findings from the stereotype threat literature indicating that individuals who are strongly identified with a particular domain show greater effects of stereotype threat on performance than individuals who are not identified with the domain (Aronson et al, 1999;Steele, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…That is, students who were more strongly identified with the school and who held stereotyped beliefs about the academic domains emphasized at the school may have been more negatively impacted by their stereotypical beliefs than students who were less strongly identified with the school. This finding parallels other research on the importance of domain identification on performance, such as findings from the stereotype threat literature indicating that individuals who are strongly identified with a particular domain show greater effects of stereotype threat on performance than individuals who are not identified with the domain (Aronson et al, 1999;Steele, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, for this study, a condition in which nothing was said about the stereotype condition was added, in which participants were not given any information about stereotypes. It was unclear whether simply working on the math-related task was enough to induce an implicit stereotype threat (e.g., Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002;Smith & Johnson, 2006;Smith & White, 2002) or whether working on the task with no stereotype information would serve as a control condition (e.g., Aronson et al, 1999;Schmader & Johns, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotype threat is thought to be activated by situational cues (henceforth "primes") that remind individuals that their group is negatively stereotyped (Aronson et al 1999). These reminders lead to negative performance via several mechanisms (Pennington et al 2016;Schmader and Johns 2003), such as depleting working memory (Schmader, Johns, and Forbes 2008) or increasing mental load (Croizet et al 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Stereotype Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%