2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When, where and how the bridge breaks: anaphase bridge breakage plays a crucial role in gene amplification and HSR generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
144
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
10
144
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,3,4 According to the breakage-fusion-bridge model of amplification, the initiating event in HSR formation is double chromatid breakage at a fragile site or telomere erosion, 2,26,27 fused sister chromatids and breaking of the anaphase bridges. 28 Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles could then result in inverted amplified structures, 29 and the mutated sister chromatids are distributed to the daughter cells giving rise to intra-tumor heterogeneity. 30 Gene amplifications are also acquired by selection and unequal segregation of circular extrachromosomal chromatin (dmin and episomes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3,4 According to the breakage-fusion-bridge model of amplification, the initiating event in HSR formation is double chromatid breakage at a fragile site or telomere erosion, 2,26,27 fused sister chromatids and breaking of the anaphase bridges. 28 Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles could then result in inverted amplified structures, 29 and the mutated sister chromatids are distributed to the daughter cells giving rise to intra-tumor heterogeneity. 30 Gene amplifications are also acquired by selection and unequal segregation of circular extrachromosomal chromatin (dmin and episomes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-5) [3][4][5][6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] . This method is now also used to measure NPBs, a biomarker of dicentric chromosomes resulting from telomere end-fusions or DNA misrepair, and to measure NBUDs, a biomarker of gene amplification [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] . The significance of these developments and the concept of the CBMN assay as a ''cytome'' assay of chromosomal instability are explained in the following sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of anaphase bridges and NPBs has been observed in models of rodent and human intestinal cancer in vivo and shown to correlate with telomere length, indicating that NPB formation may also be used as a surrogate measure of critically short telomeres 25 . Real-time in vitro studies showed that anaphase bridges may be broken in more than one region during late anaphase, leading to the formation of acentric chromosome fragments and eventually MNi 26,27 . Therefore, some MNi may also originate from broken anaphase bridges although whether this actually happens in cytokinesisblocked cells remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the marked presence of MNi and NBUDs without any stimulus demonstrates evident traces of mitotic errors and reinforces the CIN phenotype in both cell lines evaluated. The MNi are the result of lagging or broken chromosomes (double strand breaks), chromatid cohesion defects, telomere fusions or fragmentation of anaphase bridges (NBUDs) (Shimizu et al 2005;Fenech 2007). Although we did not find differences in MNi quantity between the cell lines, we found that UW473 showed significantly more NPBs and BUDs than UW402 cells, important biomarkers of a chromosomally instable phenotype (Gisselsson et al 2000;Gisselsson 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%