2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“When we say no we mean no”: Interpreting negation in vision and language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous counter-productive effects of negation can be found in the literature: e.g. in the political context [8], in the context of prohibitive signs [9], in research on questions and negation as tools of insinuation [10], and in studies on mental control mechanisms [11]. However, it is also important to underline that in the last several years a large of amount research has shown that a delay in negation processing can be alleviated by pragmatics and different semantic contexts [12, 13,14,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous counter-productive effects of negation can be found in the literature: e.g. in the political context [8], in the context of prohibitive signs [9], in research on questions and negation as tools of insinuation [10], and in studies on mental control mechanisms [11]. However, it is also important to underline that in the last several years a large of amount research has shown that a delay in negation processing can be alleviated by pragmatics and different semantic contexts [12, 13,14,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This importance has also been acknowledged in recent approaches to the subject in the field of cognitive linguistics: "It is well-known to both lay people and researchers interested in the meaningful functioning of language that antonymy (…) as a binary contrast used in order to express opposition, is a commonplace in all kinds of communicative modalities and registers: written as well as spoken, fact as well as fiction and formal as well as informal. Antonymy is also important in the design of iconic signs, such as traffic signs, and in visual works of art of different kinds (Giora, Heruti, Metuki, & Ofer, 2009)…" (Paradis & Willners, 2011). Everyday behavior is regulated by this relationship, more than one might realize: "Try visiting a public lavatory without checking which is the 'gents' and which is the 'ladies'.…”
Section: Introduction: Intermediates and The Cognitive Structure Of Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the consequent instructions in (6) and (7) are stated in terms of erasing rather than removing, as in van der Sandt (1991). The concept of erasure was adopted from Giora et al (2009) and is intended to express the fact that x does not completely disappear from the mental model. Or, in other words, x will be retained rather than suppressed (see for this processing distinction Giora, 2003Giora, , 2007.…”
Section: Types Of Negation In Natural Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing the question whether the visual modality is equipped with devices equivalent to lexical/morphological markers such as no, not or un-, Giora et al (2009) call attention to conventional visual markers like (red) crosses and stripes used, for example, in traffic signs and price tags announcing discounts. Such markers establish negation by being superimposed upon an image (or a word), their scope being determined by their size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%