2018
DOI: 10.1002/hast.866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking in Advanced Dementia Is No Longer Voluntary

Abstract: In “On Avoiding Deep Dementia,” Norman Cantor astutely notes that, for some individuals, the concept of “protracted maintenance during progressive cognitive dysfunction and helplessness is an intolerably degrading prospect.” This cannot be argued with. Cantor's solution, however—that in the wake of a dementia diagnosis, patients should have the option to direct, in advance, instructions for voluntary stopping of eating and drinking should they develop a state of deep dementia—is more ethically challenging than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is conflict in the literature regarding the ethics and legality of ACDs that request the cessation of handfeeding in progressive dementia. 5,[9][10][11] In our patient's case, although the directives were not legally binding, the health care team felt that the ACD, along with his wife's input, was the best guide to appropriate care provision, particularly when it became increasingly likely that he would not regain his previous cognitive abilities. Ultimately, regardless of the instructional or values-based designation of his written instructions, there was uniform agreement that he could not have made his wishes any clearer, and accordingly this was respected.…”
Section: Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There is conflict in the literature regarding the ethics and legality of ACDs that request the cessation of handfeeding in progressive dementia. 5,[9][10][11] In our patient's case, although the directives were not legally binding, the health care team felt that the ACD, along with his wife's input, was the best guide to appropriate care provision, particularly when it became increasingly likely that he would not regain his previous cognitive abilities. Ultimately, regardless of the instructional or values-based designation of his written instructions, there was uniform agreement that he could not have made his wishes any clearer, and accordingly this was respected.…”
Section: Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, interdisciplinary there is no consensus on whether VSED is suicide, physician-assisted suicide, passive euthanasia or an intentional natural death (Simon, 2018) and the discussions about that remains ongoing (Stängle, 2021) Against this background, often inhibitions arise among FC and professionals in accompanying someone who (wants to) carry out VSED (Fringer et al, 2018), but there is consensus that support of a person who is willing to die through VSED may only be offered if there is no doubt about the ability to make independent decisions (Walther, 2015). Discussions about this are increasingly taking place in the context of people with dementia (Marks, 2016;Pope, 2019;Trowse, 2019;Wright et al, 2019) and with regard to inclusion in living wills (Christenson, 2019;Chuang & Flicker, 2018;Menzel, 2017). However, the German Association for Palliative Medicine states that assistance during VSED can be differentiated as assistance in dying and not as assistance to die .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%