2019
DOI: 10.1109/jcn.2019.000036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When to preempt? Age of information minimization under link capacity constraint

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a scenario where a source continuously monitors an object and sends time-stamped status updates to a destination through a rate-limited link. We assume updates arrive randomly at the source according to a Bernoulli process. Due to the link capacity constraint, it takes multiple time slots for the source to complete the transmission of an update. Therefore, when a new update arrives at the source during the transmission of another update, the source needs to decide whether to skip the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lots of work pertaining to AoI minimization have appeared in the recent literature, with frameworks that include queuing, optimization and scheduling, energy harvesting, remote estimation, and coding, see, e.g., [1]- [14]. Of particular relevance to our work are those in [15]- [23], which show that the notion of preemption of updates in service and replacing them by new ones is viable for AoI minimization in various settings, which is mainly owing to the nature of AoI that promotes sending fresh updates. This is discussed in a queuing framework in [15]- [17], and more recently in [18] that also extends to the case of multiple sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lots of work pertaining to AoI minimization have appeared in the recent literature, with frameworks that include queuing, optimization and scheduling, energy harvesting, remote estimation, and coding, see, e.g., [1]- [14]. Of particular relevance to our work are those in [15]- [23], which show that the notion of preemption of updates in service and replacing them by new ones is viable for AoI minimization in various settings, which is mainly owing to the nature of AoI that promotes sending fresh updates. This is discussed in a queuing framework in [15]- [17], and more recently in [18] that also extends to the case of multiple sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method, and quite the simplest one, is by completing the square in the Lagrangian in (23). Specifically, (23) can be rewritten equivalently as L =…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the relation between the optimal value of the constraint CMDP in (5) and the optimal value of the relaxed unconstrained MDP in (7) can be expressed as follows [13].…”
Section: B Cmdp Relaxation Via Lagrange Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior results [8]- [18] are no longer applicable for such a scenario, as they assume uniform status update packet sizes and a network in which one status update can be delivered in one transmission slot. Recently, the authors in [24] proposed optimal status update policies to minimize the average AoI for a status monitoring system with uniform and non-uniform packet sizes. However, the focus of [24] is restricted to a system with a single source and random arrivals of status updates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the authors in [24] proposed optimal status update policies to minimize the average AoI for a status monitoring system with uniform and non-uniform packet sizes. However, the focus of [24] is restricted to a system with a single source and random arrivals of status updates. Indeed, scenarios in which there exists multiple sources whose status updates can be generated at will by the devices, are not considered in [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%