2006
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Things Are Better or Worse than Expected: The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Allocation of Processing Resources

Abstract: Abstract& Access to limited-capacity neural systems of cognitive control must be restricted to the most relevant information. How the brain identifies and selects items for preferential processing is not fully understood. Anatomical models often place the selection mechanism in the medial frontal cortex (MFC), and one computational model proposes that the mesotelencephalic dopamine (DA) system, via its reward prediction properties, provides a ''gate'' through which information gains access to limited-capacity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
238
3
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
37
238
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, this is in line with several prior studies demonstrating such influence for simpler visual cue stimuli (e.g., Bellebaum & Daum, 2008;Martin & Potts, 2011;Mas-Herrero & Marco-PallarĂ©s, 2014;Pfabigan et al, 2011;Pfabigan et al, 2015;Potts et al, 2006;Walsh & Anderson, 2011). More specifically, the observed patterns in the feedback-locked FRN and FMΞ power suggest that outcome processing in the pMFC is sensitive to different types of reward prediction errors.…”
Section: Feedback Reception Stagesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, this is in line with several prior studies demonstrating such influence for simpler visual cue stimuli (e.g., Bellebaum & Daum, 2008;Martin & Potts, 2011;Mas-Herrero & Marco-PallarĂ©s, 2014;Pfabigan et al, 2011;Pfabigan et al, 2015;Potts et al, 2006;Walsh & Anderson, 2011). More specifically, the observed patterns in the feedback-locked FRN and FMΞ power suggest that outcome processing in the pMFC is sensitive to different types of reward prediction errors.…”
Section: Feedback Reception Stagesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous research has repeatedly demonstrated that neural mechanisms involved in such performance monitoring functions are subject to action-outcome expectancies. In particular, numerous recent studies have shown that electrocortical correlates of performance monitoring in the scalp-recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) are sensitive to the predictive value of cue stimuli preceding action outcomes (e.g., Bellebaum & Daum, 2008;Chase, Swainson, Durham, Benham, & Cools, 2011;Hauser et al, 2014;Hewig et al, 2007;Martin & Potts, 2011;Mas-Herrero & Marco-PallarĂ©s, 2014;Pfabigan, Alexopoulos, Bauer, & Sailer, 2011;Pfabigan et al, 2015;Potts, Martin, Burton, & Montague, 2006;Walsh & Anderson, 2011;Wu & Zhou, 2009;Xu et al, 2011). In the majority of these studies, the indicative cues were simple visual stimuli like, for instance, geometrical shapes, letters, or colors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact sources remain speculative due to the low number of electrodes included in the current study and the fact that the scalp distribution does not necessarily reflect the exact location of its underlying sources (Guillem et al, 2001;Potts and Tucker, 2001). Recently, for instance, P2a was linked to sources in medial prefrontal cortex (Potts et al, 2006). Hence, future research with brain monitoring techniques that have a greater spatial resolution compared to ERPs (e.g., fMRI) is needed to confirm our hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…While the present findings fit with each of the response-based theories of the ERN, they are also in line with a related component, the feedback-related negativity (FRN). FRN occurs following a feedback stimulus long after a given response (Badgaiyan and Posner 1998;Gehring and Willoughby 2002;Holroyd and Coles 2002;Miltner et al 1997;Nieuwenhuis et al 2004a) with greater amplitude following negative, unexpected feedback (Cohen et al 2007;Hajcak et al 2007;Holroyd et al 2003;Potts et al 2006). …”
Section: Do the Waveforms Reflect Ern Activity?mentioning
confidence: 99%