1996
DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci1102_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When the Interface Is a Face

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
208
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
208
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Speech simulation and speech understanding technology have reached the point that real time or automated audio and video interviews (Alerfli & Higley, 1995;Johnston & Walton, 1995;Tourangeau & Smith, 1996;Turner et al, 1998) and interviews by digitized characters (e.g., Sproull, Subramani, & Kiesler, 1996) can be used in place of traditional face-to-face interviews. This technology allows for computer "interviews" with self-administration, anonymity, and no presence of others, as well as contingent questioning (e.g., branching).…”
Section: Directions For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech simulation and speech understanding technology have reached the point that real time or automated audio and video interviews (Alerfli & Higley, 1995;Johnston & Walton, 1995;Tourangeau & Smith, 1996;Turner et al, 1998) and interviews by digitized characters (e.g., Sproull, Subramani, & Kiesler, 1996) can be used in place of traditional face-to-face interviews. This technology allows for computer "interviews" with self-administration, anonymity, and no presence of others, as well as contingent questioning (e.g., branching).…”
Section: Directions For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chan and Khalid (2003), for example, found that users did not only experience the voice controlled ATM as more fun and natural, but also as difficult to learn. Also, Sproull et al (1996) found that the users of an interface that showed personality in the form of a human face were less confident than users operating a text interface. In addition, Alpert et al (2003) found that users of a user-adaptive interface had difficulty to understand how it worked.…”
Section: Product Intelligence Innovation Attributes and Consumer Satmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, increasing anthropomorphism leads to longer interactions with the robot and a more positive, lifelike evaluation of the robot [19]. A human-like agent also triggers stronger social reactions compared to completely textual agents [1,35]. Human appearance appears to be important for social interaction, yet Nowak and Biocca demonstrated that participants were engaged with a virtual agent, regardless whether the avatar looked human or not [28].…”
Section: Form Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%