2021
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When the green in green packaging backfires: Gender effects and perceived masculinity of environmentally friendly products

Abstract: Pollution and the degradation of natural resources remain among the most pressing challenges facing our planet in the 21st century (OECD, 2020). As emphasized by White et al. (2019), the behaviors of individual consumers today have unprecedented consequences for the natural environment. It is thus not surprising that substantial efforts have been dedicated towards understanding how consumers can be motivated to purchase green rather than conventional products (Yan et al., 2020).Previous research suggests that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stronger the consumers' intention is, the greater the possibility of implementation behavior is (Ong et al, 2022). Based on this, the following hypothesis is put forward: H4: Consumers' willingness to buy bank financial products has a significant positive impact on the behavior of buying bank financial products (Felix et al, 2022).…”
Section: H3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stronger the consumers' intention is, the greater the possibility of implementation behavior is (Ong et al, 2022). Based on this, the following hypothesis is put forward: H4: Consumers' willingness to buy bank financial products has a significant positive impact on the behavior of buying bank financial products (Felix et al, 2022).…”
Section: H3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers’ willingness to buy bank financial products has a significant positive impact on the behavior of buying bank financial products ( Felix et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Basis and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, future studies should look at whether consumers who are strongly driven to dispose of e-waste are more likely to be loyal to green producers (Lin et al, 2017) and purchase green products (Felix et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021). Similarly, future research will benefit from looking into the relationship between customers' ewaste disposal behaviour and their willingness to pay a premium for environmentally friendly products (Katt & Meixner, 2020;Kautish et al, 2019).…”
Section: G Oing Forward: Future Re S E Arch Ag Endamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this knowledge vacuum, we anticipate that consumer e‐waste disposal behaviour may have an impact on environmental variables and downstream consumer psychological responses, with significant implications for practitioners and government agencies. As a result, future studies should look at whether consumers who are strongly driven to dispose of e‐waste are more likely to be loyal to green producers (Lin et al., 2017) and purchase green products (Felix et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Similarly, future research will benefit from looking into the relationship between customers’ e‐waste disposal behaviour and their willingness to pay a premium for environmentally friendly products (Katt & Meixner, 2020; Kautish et al., 2019).…”
Section: Going Forward: Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on the relationship between packaging and consumption has been mainly concentrated in the field of consumer health and most studies to date have been conducted in the developed countries of Europe and America. Studies have been conducted on visual cues of packaging design, such as shape (Raghubir & Krishna, 1999; Sevilla & Kahn, 2014; Valentina et al., 2019; Wansink & van Ittersum, 2003); color (Felix et al, 2021; Genschow et al., 2012; Herbes et al., 2020; Valentina et al., 2019); form (Huyghe et al., 2017); material (Deng & Srinivasan, 2013; Kowalska et al, 2020; Singh & Pandey, 2018; Werle et al., 2016; Ye et al., 2020); image (Hagen, 2021; Madzharov & Block, 2010) and size (Coelho do Vale et al., 2008; Liu & Haws, 2020; Payne et al., 2014; Petit et al., 2020; Scott et al., 2008; Wansink, 1996), that have demonstrated to influence on consumption quantity (see Table 1). All these studies focus on different visual cues of independent package instead of combined packaging, including inner and outer package.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%