2016
DOI: 10.1177/1046496416667816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Task Conflict Becomes Personal

Abstract: Although potentially beneficial, task conflict may threaten teams because it often leads to relationship conflict. Prior research has identified a set of interpersonal factors (e.g., team communication, team trust) that help attenuate this association. The purpose of this article is to provide an alternative perspective that focuses on the moderating role of performance-related factors (i.e., perceived team performance). Using social identity theory, we build a model that predicts how task conflict associates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(233 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the current investigations of high-tech teams, this review was unfortunately unable to differentiate across different types of service sectors due to the limited number of studies that have been published. Building on past research and the specific studies currently reviewed (e.g., Carter & Mossholder, 2015; Guenter et al, 2016; Hannah et al, 2011), future research should be encouraged to undertake efforts to classify and understand the differences in necessary inputs and processes across different sectors such as health care, education, and hospitality services. For example, Marlow, Bisbey, Lacerenza, and Salas (2018) recently published a review of health care team performance measures to guide future health care focused research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the current investigations of high-tech teams, this review was unfortunately unable to differentiate across different types of service sectors due to the limited number of studies that have been published. Building on past research and the specific studies currently reviewed (e.g., Carter & Mossholder, 2015; Guenter et al, 2016; Hannah et al, 2011), future research should be encouraged to undertake efforts to classify and understand the differences in necessary inputs and processes across different sectors such as health care, education, and hospitality services. For example, Marlow, Bisbey, Lacerenza, and Salas (2018) recently published a review of health care team performance measures to guide future health care focused research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, moderate task-related conflicts can have positive outcomes as they improve group-decision making and prevent groupthink ( Janis, 1972 ; Nemeth, 1986 ; Cosier and Schwenk, 1990 ; Amason, 1996 ; Brodbeck et al, 2002 ). Such positive outcomes, however, are exclusive to task conflicts and not found for relationship conflicts ( Guenter et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fourth, the extant research on prior team performance has presented mixed findings about its impact on subsequent teamwork. Whereas some studies have reported that teams with better prior performance are more resourceful and resilient and thus face fewer interruptions and less uncertainty when changes occur (Guenter et al, 2016; Mathieu et al, 2008), other studies have found that better-performing teams are more hesitant about accepting changes (Choi & Levine, 2004; Schippers et al, 2013). Our research, therefore, provides one plausible solution to reconcile these seemingly contradictory findings by taking the particular feature of team changes into consideration, such as the extent to which these changes concern teams’ relational dynamics or functional profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the team input–mediator–output–input model, team functioning is cyclical in nature, such that team outputs (e.g., performance) in one performance episode can serve as an important input and impact team functioning in future episodes (Mathieu et al, 2008). Moreover, research has shown that how well a team has performed in the past can influence how team members appraise their current and subsequent teamwork experiences, among which affective appraisals are likely a key component (e.g., Guenter et al, 2016; Schippers et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theory and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%