2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716408090048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect

Abstract: Some second language (L2) learners return from study abroad experiences with seemingly no change in their L2 ability. In this study we investigate whether a certain level of internal cognitive resources is necessary in order for individuals to take full advantage of the study abroad experience. Specifically, we examined the role of working memory resources in lexical comprehension and production for learners who had or had not studied abroad. Participants included native English learners of Spanish. Participan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…VWM has been considered important for grammar learning through its involvement in noticing (Mackey, Philp, Egi, Fuji, & Tatsumi, 2002) and processing of linguistic structures (Harrington & Sawyer, 1992;Sunderman & Kroll, 2009), but these claims have been almost exclusively based on L2 classroom studies. There is some evidence, however, that VWM is related to grammar learning more strongly in explicit L2 learning conditions than in implicit learning conditions (Tagarelli, Borges Mota, & Rebuschat, 2011), in line with the idea that explicit learning requires the control of attention, an important function of VWM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VWM has been considered important for grammar learning through its involvement in noticing (Mackey, Philp, Egi, Fuji, & Tatsumi, 2002) and processing of linguistic structures (Harrington & Sawyer, 1992;Sunderman & Kroll, 2009), but these claims have been almost exclusively based on L2 classroom studies. There is some evidence, however, that VWM is related to grammar learning more strongly in explicit L2 learning conditions than in implicit learning conditions (Tagarelli, Borges Mota, & Rebuschat, 2011), in line with the idea that explicit learning requires the control of attention, an important function of VWM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One core element of WM, and in particular verbal Working Memory (vWM), is the “phonological loop”, which has been shown to be critical for language acquisition during development, as well as language processing in daily life (Baddeley, 1992). However, it has been widely reported that WM capacity may be limited for students who are learning in an environment where the language of instruction is not their native language (Andersson, 2010; Kroll et al, 2002; Mackey et al, 2002; McDonald, 2006; Miyake & Friedman, 1998; Service, 1992; Service et al, 2002; Sunderman & Kroll, 2009; Tokowicz, Michael & Kroll, 2004) and this appears to be due to demands on WM resources in the second language (L2) (Service et al, 2002). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, some WM researchers in cognitive psychology have pointed out that the total performance score should better approximate a continuous variable such as the WM span (Miyake 2001; also see Sunderman and Kroll 2009; Rai et al. 2011 for a similar argument).…”
Section: An Integrated Framework Of Wm For Slamentioning
confidence: 98%