When Strangers Become Neighbours: Managing Cities of Difference

Sandercock, Leonie

doi:10.1080/14649350050135176

Cited by 220 publications

(160 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

146

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, it is conceptually related to wider critiques against modernistic planning in general (e.g. Abram, 2011;Healey, 2010;Sandercock, 2000) and the field of transport planning in particular (e.g. Beckmann, 2004;Sheller, 2011;Urry, 2004).…”

Section: Challenges Of Shared Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

The domestication of planning ideas – the case of Shared Space

Peters

2017

FormAkademisk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Challenges Of Shared Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

The domestication of planning ideas – the case of Shared Space

Peters

2017

FormAkademisk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This ignoring leads to un-appropriate urban space, especially for women who belong to marginal group, and thus exclude them from the public space into limited spaces (Sandercock, 2000(Sandercock, , 2003Fincher and Jacobs, 1998;Razack, 1998;Healley et al, 1997;Hayden, 1995;Young, 1990).…”

Section: Spatial Planning As a Tool Of Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…New theories, which are centred on the relations between space, marginal groups and power, have emphasized the need to recognize cultural and social differences and to take in account the demands of the different groups living in the urban space (Fenster, 2005;Sandercock, 2000Sandercock, , 2003Fincher and Jacobs, 1998;Razack, 1998;Healley et al, 1997;Young, 1990;Hayden, 1995). These theories underline the own spatial experience of different groups while taking into consideration the voice of the "Other", providing a representation for these persons, being aware of their culture and needs.…”

Section: Spatial Planning As a Tool Of Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urban planning and the everyday experience of Palestinian women in Jaffa

Saliba¹

2014

dag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to examine how planning policies and practices affect the everyday spatial practice of Palestinian women living in Jaffa. To do this, in-depth interviews were conducted with Palestinian women living in Jaffa, and afterward, "thematic analysis" method was used to analyze the narratives. The main finding of this study is that the ignoring, neglecting and discriminatory planning of the local and national institutions, has produced un-appropriate and un-safety spaces for Palestina women, which in turn lead to limit and reduce their everyday spatial practices and to exclude them to a limited social, cultural, economic and geographical space. At the same time, these discriminated and ignoring policies lead Palestinian women to create alternative-Palestinian spaces, which despite being limited and narrow, allow them to expand their spatial mobility, feel comfortable and re-define their identity. Keywords: planning; power relations; Palestinian women; Jaffa; exclusion; alienation. Resum. Planificació urbana i la experiència quotidiana de les dones palestines a JaffaAquest article pretén examinar com les polítiques de planificació afecten la pràctica espacial quotidiana de les dones palestines que viuen a Jaffa. Per fer-ho, s'han realitzat entrevistes en profunditat a dones palestines residents a Jaffa i a continuació s'ha utilitzat el mètode de «l'anàlisi temàtica» per analitzar les narratives. El principal resultat de l'estudi és que la planificació de les institucions locals i nacionals, que ignoren, ometen i discriminen les dones palestines, ha produït espais inadequats i insegurs. Aquests espais limiten i redueixen les seves pràctiques espacials quotidianes i exclouen les dones a uns espais socials, culturals, econòmics i geogràfics limitats. Al mateix temps, aquestes polítiques discriminatòries i indiferents condueixen les dones palestines a crear espais palestins alternatius que, malgrat ser limitats i petits, els permeten eixamplar la seva mobilitat espacial, experimentar confort i redefinir les seves identitats. Paraules clau: planificació; relacions de poder; dones palestines; Jaffa; exclusió; alienació. Resumen. Planificación urbana y la experiencia cotidiana de las mujeres Palestinas en JaffaEste artículo pretende examinar cómo las políticas de planificación urbana afectan a la práctica espacial cotidiana de las mujeres palestinas que viven en Jaffa. Para ello se han realizado entrevistas en profundidad a mujeres Palestinas residentes en Jaffa y a continuación se ha utilizado el método de «análisis temático» para analizar las narrativas. El principal resultado del estudio es que la planificación de las instituciones locales y nacionales, que ignoran, omiten y discriminan a las mujeres palestinas, ha producido espacios inadecuados e inseguros. Estos espacios limitan y reducen sus prácticas espaciales cotidianas y reducen a las mujeres a unos espacios sociales, culturales, económicos y geográficos limitados. Al mismo tiempo, estas políticas discriminatorias e indiferentes conducen a l...

show abstract

“…Local knowledge in most cases also increases both levels of civic engagement and selfdetermination by allowing representatives and in some cases citizens -often in disadvantaged communities that have limited voice and influence -to define and address problems in their communities (Corburn, 2005a;Innes & Booher, 2010). It also allows neighboring communities of (often cultural) differences to express conflict in a therapeutic manner (Sandercock, 2000). Examples of both planning and public-health practice that elevate community-based information in decision making include Healey (1997), Forester (1999), Minkler (1997), Israel et al (1998).…”

Section: Community Knowledge In Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participation, Information, Values, and Community Interests Within Health Impact Assessments

Iroz-Elardo

2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health impact assessment (HIA) has emerged in the U.S. as one promising process to increase social and environmental justice through addressing health equity issues within planning. HIA practice is guided by values such as democracy and equity and grounded in broad social determinants of health. The most readily applied definition of democracy is problematic because it implies an element of direct, participatory engagement with the public. This is at odds with HIA practice that largely relies on stakeholder engagement strategies.This dissertation critically examines the engagement strategies of three transportation planning HIA cases to more fully understand how the HIA process may or may not promote democratic values and protect community health interests. It employs a multi-case study design that uses qualitative content analysis to trace community health interests through the HIA process, HIA document, and target plan. It finds that while the field is overstating the participatory nature of HIA, commitments to health equity and broad determinants of health protect community health interests with and without robust engagement of community stakeholders.ii DedicationIn loving memory of Patty Sue Stewart who fed my love of learning, introduced me to some of the worlds' great cities, and instilled values of justice and peace.iii Acknowledgements

show abstract

When Strangers Become Neighbours: Managing Cities of Difference

Cited by 220 publications

References 6 publications

The domestication of planning ideas – the case of Shared Space

The domestication of planning ideas – the case of Shared Space

Urban planning and the everyday experience of Palestinian women in Jaffa

Participation, Information, Values, and Community Interests Within Health Impact Assessments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About