When Significant Others Suffer: German Validation of the Burden Assessment Scale (BAS)

Abstract

There is a need of an economical, reliable, and valid instrument in the German-speaking countries to measure the burden of relatives who care for mentally ill persons. We translated the Burden Assessment Scale (BAS) and conducted a study investigating factor structure, psychometric quality and predictive validity. We used confirmative factor analyses (CFA, maximum-likelihood method) to examine the dimensionality of the German BAS in a sample of 215 relatives (72% women; M = 32 years, SD = 14, range: 18 to 77; 39% employed) of mentally ill persons (50% (ex-)partner or (best) friend; M = 32 years, SD = 13, range 8 to 64; main complaints were depression and/or anxiety). Cronbach’s α determined the internal consistency. We examined predictive validity using regression analyses including the BAS and validated scales of social systems functioning (Experience In Social Systems Questionnaire, EXIS.pers, EXIS.org) and psychopathology (Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI). Variables that might have influenced the dependent variables (e.g. age, gender, education, employment and civil status) were controlled by their introduction in the first step, and the BAS in the second step of the regression analyses. A model with four correlated factors (Disrupted Activities, Personal Distress, Time Perspective, Guilt) showed the best fit. With respect to the number of items included, the internal consistency was very good. The modified German BAS predicted relatives’ social systems functioning and psychopathology. The economical design makes the 19-item BAS promising for practice-oriented research, and for studies under time constraints. Strength, limitations and future directions are discussed.

Open Dialogue compared to treatment as usual for adults experiencing a mental health crisis: Protocol for the ODDESSI multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial

“…The Burden Assessment Scale [49] A 19-item self-report measure completed by the primary caregiver to assess perceived objective and subjective consequences of providing care to a service user, measured at 3, 6, and 24 months, (alpha coefficient, 0.92 [27]).…”

Implementation of the patient version of the evidence-based (S3) guideline for psychosocial interventions for patients with severe mental illness (IMPPETUS): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

“…6. Relatives' burden of care (see objective 8) will be assessed using the 'Burden Assessment scale' (BAS) [25]. The BAS is a 19-item scale that focuses on specific subjective and objective consequences of relatives caring for persons with severe mental disorders within the past 6 months.…”

Comparing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Systemic Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial (SOPHO‐CBT/ST)

“…While a pilot study is not reliable and valid enough to encompass the evaluation of a new treatment approach, ST however showed clinically significant effects in patients' reduction in social anxiety symptoms and the improvement in psychological, interpersonal, social system, and global functioning from baseline to the end of psychotherapy. In addition, ST also contributed to the reduction of the psychosocial burden of patients' significant others (Hunger et al, 2018;Hunger, Krause et al, 2016).…”