2017
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When populists become popular: comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement Pegida and German political parties

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
84
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Mariani et al [85] and Stier et al [86], Facebook data was obtained using software developed ad hoc for this type of study (Facebook model). This software is prepared for the massive extraction of data and the treatment of Big Data, and has the necessary permission from Facebook to access its databases.…”
Section: Data Collection Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Mariani et al [85] and Stier et al [86], Facebook data was obtained using software developed ad hoc for this type of study (Facebook model). This software is prepared for the massive extraction of data and the treatment of Big Data, and has the necessary permission from Facebook to access its databases.…”
Section: Data Collection Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Germany, the anti-Islamic grassroots movement PEGIDA shares a considerable Facebook user base and set of issue frames with the Alternative für Deutschland party. (Stier, Posch, Bleier, & Strohmaier, 2017). Early stages of the movement-party relationship suggested that the party grew by mirroring selective messages of the movement (Rucht, in press).…”
Section: Organizational Preferences On the Rightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facebook is the online social network site with the greatest reach in most countries and it is considered an important platform for political communication. Scholars investigated, for example, how political parties communicate on Facebook (Arzheimer, 2015;Magin, Podschuweit, Haßler, & Russmann, 2016;Stier et al, 2018;Stier, Posch, Bleier, & Strohmaier, 2017), how users interact with posts from media organizations' pages (Schmidt et al, 2017), or which (media) sources were referred to by parties and their followers on political pages (Bachl, 2018).…”
Section: An Evaluation Of Retrospective Content Collection On Facebookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The posts were retrieved in July 2014. The sampling period of Stier et al (2017) was December 2014 to August 2016, all content was collected at the end of the sampling period. Schmidt et al (2017) proceeded similarly for their sampling period of six years (January 2010 to December 2015).…”
Section: An Evaluation Of Retrospective Content Collection On Facebookmentioning
confidence: 99%