2015
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2014.2328319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Pixels Team up: Spatially Weighted Sparse Coding for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early spatial-spectral feature extractors had hyperparameters that required tuning (e.g. gray-level co-occurrence matrices [23], Gabor [24], sparse coding [25], extended morphological attribute profiles [26], etc). These hand-crafted features could fail to generalize well across multiple datasets, so they were replaced with learned features that were automatically tuned from the data itself.…”
Section: Deep-learning For Non-rgb Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early spatial-spectral feature extractors had hyperparameters that required tuning (e.g. gray-level co-occurrence matrices [23], Gabor [24], sparse coding [25], extended morphological attribute profiles [26], etc). These hand-crafted features could fail to generalize well across multiple datasets, so they were replaced with learned features that were automatically tuned from the data itself.…”
Section: Deep-learning For Non-rgb Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 177 4 of 9 usually belong to the same materials [25]. Hence, the joint sparse model considers the sparse representation of both target pixels and their eight neighborhood pixels, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Joint Sparse Model Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use the simultaneous orthogonal matching pursuit (SOMP) to solve Equation (8). When the sparse coefficient matrix is recovered, we can label the target pixel x by the minimal reconstructed residual, shown by Equation (9) usually belong to the same materials [25]. Hence, the joint sparse model considers the sparse representation of both target pixels and their eight neighborhood pixels, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Joint Sparse Model Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, local homogeneity was exploited to select landmark points for nonlinear manifold-based spectral unmixing (Bottai et al 2013). Recently, image partitioning was integrated with a reweighted λ 1 framework in a spatially weighted sparse coding (SWSC) algorithm (Soltani-Farani and Rabiee 2015).…”
Section: Abundance Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%