2017
DOI: 10.3233/jad-161285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Patient Engagement and Research Ethics Collide: Lessons from a Dementia Forum

Abstract: Abstract. The importance of patient engagement in research has been gaining recognition since the turn of the 21st century. However, little is known about the perspectives of people with dementia on the process of discovery. To fill this gap and to inform priorities in patient engagement in the context of dementia research, the Clinic for Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders at the University of British Columbia hosted an interactive session for members of the patient community and of the general public to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While patients with advanced or metastatic MCC do have the opportunity to participate in clinical trials, individuals with dementia or cognitive impairment are usually excluded from such trials; in this context, various countries have different regulations . In Germany, patients with cognitive impairment that precludes them from giving informed consent were – until recently – allowed to participate in clinical trials only if they stood to personally benefit from it.…”
Section: Psycho‐oncological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While patients with advanced or metastatic MCC do have the opportunity to participate in clinical trials, individuals with dementia or cognitive impairment are usually excluded from such trials; in this context, various countries have different regulations . In Germany, patients with cognitive impairment that precludes them from giving informed consent were – until recently – allowed to participate in clinical trials only if they stood to personally benefit from it.…”
Section: Psycho‐oncological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of participants in this study indicated a preference for online consent. Some studies argue that participants’ preferences and satisfaction should determine the method of providing informed consent information, suggesting that the most acceptable method for participants constitutes the best approach ( Agre et al , 1997 ; Kraft et al , 2016 ; Robillard et al , 2017 ). However, this survey raises questions about the acceptability of online consent and the extent to which this might be an example of the naturalistic fallacy (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Im Falle eines fortgeschrittenen oder metastasierten MCC besteht in begrenztem Umfang die Möglichkeit der Behandlung im Rahmen von klinischen Studien. In der Regel sind aber demente oder kognitiv eingeschränkte Patienten von der Teilnahme an klinischen Studien ausgeschlossen, wobei es in verschiedenen Ländern diesbezüglich auch differente Regelungen gibt . Bis vor kurzem war in Deutschland die Studienteilnahme von Patienten, die aufgrund kognitiver Einschränkungen nicht mehr selbst einwilligen können, nur dann erlaubt, wenn damit ein möglicher Nutzen für sie selbst verbunden ist.…”
Section: Psychoonkologische Aspekteunclassified