2022
DOI: 10.1109/mnet.211.2100386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Optimization Meets Machine Learning: The Case of IRS-Assisted Wireless Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the success of the IRS-aided BackCom system, the joint design of the beamforming at the reader and the IRS reflection coefficients is crucial, which is a difficult problem due to the multi-reflection nature of the system and the large number of parameters to be learned. Thus, DL based approaches have huge potential for realizing IRSaided systems, in particular, the design of IRS phase shifts for different system applications, as evidenced by [33]- [39].…”
Section: Monostatic Backscatter Joint Optimization Of Irs and Snr Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the success of the IRS-aided BackCom system, the joint design of the beamforming at the reader and the IRS reflection coefficients is crucial, which is a difficult problem due to the multi-reflection nature of the system and the large number of parameters to be learned. Thus, DL based approaches have huge potential for realizing IRSaided systems, in particular, the design of IRS phase shifts for different system applications, as evidenced by [33]- [39].…”
Section: Monostatic Backscatter Joint Optimization Of Irs and Snr Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the authors of [20] and [21] only considered the application of IRS in WPT systems. In our previous works [23]- [24], we considered the performance optimization of wireless-powered IRS-assisted single-user systems based on PS and TS protocols. Numerical results showed that PS outperforms TS when the IRS is closer to the AP, while TS outperforms PS when the IRS is closer to the users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%