When Online Lending Meets Real Estate: Examining Investment Decisions in Lending-Based Real Estate Crowdfunding

Abstract

Lending-based real estate crowdfunding, which involves the use of real estate to secure loans, has emerged as a promising alternative with lower risk than peer-to-peer lending. This study provides insights into understanding how lenders’ investment behavior is shaped by various information in such an emerging market. Using a data set from a large platform over 17 months, the authors find that lenders as a whole prefer loans secured by a borrower’s house to those secured by a mortgage, as reflected in quicker and larger lending transactions. Experienced lenders tend to invest more aggressively, in both time and amount, but exhibit a weaker preference for loans secured by a borrower’s house. A rise in housing prices is associated with quicker lending decisions, and this association is found to be stronger for loans secured by a borrower’s house. When stock market volatility is large, lenders tend to slow down their investments; such a tendency is attenuated for loans secured by a mortgage. The authors suggest that lender heterogeneity in responding to different collateral types should be incorporated into the platform’s design of an automatic transaction or a recommender system. Moreover, platform managers should consider economic conditions at the macro level when deploying their marketing strategy.

From stocks to ETFs: explaining retail investors' migration behavior

“…Previous IS studies focus on investments such as cryptocurrencies and lending-based real estate crowdfunding (Jiang et al. , 2020; Mattke et al.…”

“…, 2022). Potential information asymmetry due to privileged information (Park and Chai, 2020), stock market volatility (Jiang et al. , 2020) and social relationship to a specific company (Liang and Yuan, 2016) influence their investment behavior.…”

Fundraising activities and digitalization: defining risk indicators for evaluating equity crowdfunding campaigns

“…The main problems related to the evaluation of firms participating in the digital equity crowdfunding campaigns relate to the following: information asymmetry (Cornelius and Gokpinar, 2020); limited financial information disclosed; high uncertainty about the quality of a campaign (Jiang et al , 2020); high risk of failure at initial stages; a low level of earnings; a firm’s self-evaluation and dependence on its own capital, which influences the costs of capital; and the low liquidity of the capital share (Damodaran and Roggi, 2016). All these limits create complications for using standard evaluation principles.…”

Financial Innovation and Health Emergencies the Role of Crowdfunding Platforms in Italy

“…For these two models, the proliferation of platforms (Trusters, Walliance, Housers, CrowdEstate) also in the real estate sector which, thanks to the prospects of secure and short-term returns, have satisfied the interest of many investors (Cohen 2016;Matthiesen et al . 2017;Jiang et al 2019).…”