2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When norms loom larger than the self: Susceptibility of preference–choice consistency to normative influence across cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This factor may be relevant not only to contextual variation within cultures but also to differences between cultures. Savani, Wadhwa, Uchida, Ding, and Naidu (2015) show that the greater Indian (vs. American) propensity to disassociate choices from private preferences arises not only from the greater preference for allocentrism in decision making in Indian culture but also from the greater sensitivity to social cues in Indian contexts. Consistent with the social radar account, Indians made more choices inconsistent with their private preferences in the presence of social monitoring cues (i.e., an image of human eyes).…”
Section: From Objective Structures To Subjective Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This factor may be relevant not only to contextual variation within cultures but also to differences between cultures. Savani, Wadhwa, Uchida, Ding, and Naidu (2015) show that the greater Indian (vs. American) propensity to disassociate choices from private preferences arises not only from the greater preference for allocentrism in decision making in Indian culture but also from the greater sensitivity to social cues in Indian contexts. Consistent with the social radar account, Indians made more choices inconsistent with their private preferences in the presence of social monitoring cues (i.e., an image of human eyes).…”
Section: From Objective Structures To Subjective Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Norms affect behaviors and performance , but norms are not the sole determinants of behaviors (MacCoun, 2015). Normative influence is stronger within interdependent (vs. independent) societies, and when behaviors can (vs. cannot) be publicly monitored (Savani, Wadhwa, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Directing Behavior Through Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As norms of beauty are defined by the society, anyone who wishes to be perceived as beautiful needs to and strives to adhere to these norms (Davis, Sbrocco, Odoms-Young, and Smith 2010;Kim, Young, and Keun 2014). However, the motivation to adhere to societal norms may also depend on the salient cultural values of an individual (Savani et al 2015).…”
Section: Conceptual Development the Pursuit Of Beautymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Easterners (interdependents) gain their sense of worth and satisfaction from belonging to a larger group and adjusting oneself to promote and ensure group harmony, whereas Westerners (independents) gain their sense of worth from being unique and achieving personal goals (Bond and Smith 1996;Markus and Kitayama 1991). As such, compared to independents, interdependents' self-perceptions are influenced to a larger extent by others' opinions (Kim and Markman 2006;Kim and Markus 2004;Savani et al 2015). Further, when a person's interdependent self-construal or collective self is activated, subjective norms (instead of personal attitudes) guide behavioural intentions (Ybarra and Trafimow 1998).…”
Section: Culture and Beauty: The Role Of Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in how decisions are made tend to coincide with variations in who makes the decision. Western researchers have largely assumed that people make decisions by following their own preferences and values, but people in many cultures discount personal preference and instead seek advice, at times deferring to others' preferences, especially when the perceived norm is to discount one's own desires (Savani, Markus, & Conner, 2008;Savani, Wadhwa, Uchida, Ding, & Naidu, 2015). We return to this distinction in the ''value" section.…”
Section: ''How"mentioning
confidence: 99%