2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-020-02838-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When neighbors cheat: a test of the dear enemy phenomenon in southern red-backed salamanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plethodon cinereus and other terrestrial plethodontids are known to reduce agonistic interactions with familiar conspecifics ("dear enemy hypothesis"), especially in areas with high density (Dalton et al, 2020;Jaeger, 1981;Jaeger & Peterson, 2002). The majority of sexually mature salamander co-occurrence observations in our study were between the same sex and were more prevalent on the higher density mature plots (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plethodon cinereus and other terrestrial plethodontids are known to reduce agonistic interactions with familiar conspecifics ("dear enemy hypothesis"), especially in areas with high density (Dalton et al, 2020;Jaeger, 1981;Jaeger & Peterson, 2002). The majority of sexually mature salamander co-occurrence observations in our study were between the same sex and were more prevalent on the higher density mature plots (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It is also evident that salamanders encounter each other more frequently at the mature forest plots, but they may not engage in agonistic behaviors due to the energetic costs related to frequent aggressive interactions and allow such overlap to occur. Plethodon cinereus and other terrestrial plethodontids are known to reduce agonistic interactions with familiar conspecifics (“dear enemy hypothesis”), especially in areas with high density (Dalton et al, 2020; Jaeger, 1981; Jaeger & Peterson, 2002). The majority of sexually mature salamander co‐occurrence observations in our study were between the same sex and were more prevalent on the higher density mature plots (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although we cannot rule out that subjects interpreted a song type recorded from a different bird and broadcast from a different location as in fact still coming from the original simulated neighbour, as discussed above, great tits discriminate among individual voice characteristics (Weary and Krebs 1992). Therefore, we interpret their responses in the final playback as responses to a simulated stranger, but note that, even under dear enemy relationships, individuals may also respond aggressively to neighbours when they display from a new location (Brindley 1991; Husak and Fox 2003; Lovell and Lein 2005; Dalton et al 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They mutually benefit by minimising aggression and time spent patrolling. However, a neighbour male can become a serious threat if he breaks the agreement by attempting to steal resources (females) from an adjacent territory and/or expand his own territory to the detriment of his close neighbours (Trivers, 1971;Godard, 1993;Dalton et al, 2020). In case of no respect of the agreedupon boundary, the two individuals become rivals and the deceived male will immediately challenge the intruder (Godard, 1993;Clutton-Brock & Parker, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%