2010
DOI: 10.1080/00222930903537074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When names are wrong and colours deceive: unravelling the Pseudoceros bicolor species complex (Turbellaria: Polycladida)

Abstract: The polyclad Pseudoceros bicolor derives its name from a distinctive two-coloured dorsal colouration, which consists of a very dark, almost black central area with acute black lobes extending towards a translucent greyish margin. At least three different colour morphs have been described, ranging from a pale speckled brown through an evenly dark brown form, to a morphotype resembling the original species description. Pseudoceros aureolineatus is easily confused with the light brown colour morph of P. bicolor, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the examined specimen, those granules do not appear, and thus, the dorsal colouration is lighter. Such variation in the colour tone, while maintaining the basic pattern, has been already described by other authors (Ang & Newman 1998;Litvaitis et al 2010). Although in the original description the inner marginal band is described as sky blue or mauve, in the attached picture it can be seen that, as happens in our specimen, the band fades to white (Newman & Cannon 1994b.…”
Section: Pseudoceros Paralaticlavussupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the examined specimen, those granules do not appear, and thus, the dorsal colouration is lighter. Such variation in the colour tone, while maintaining the basic pattern, has been already described by other authors (Ang & Newman 1998;Litvaitis et al 2010). Although in the original description the inner marginal band is described as sky blue or mauve, in the attached picture it can be seen that, as happens in our specimen, the band fades to white (Newman & Cannon 1994b.…”
Section: Pseudoceros Paralaticlavussupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Pseudoceros stimpsoni shows the colour pattern comparable with the light brown morphotype of Pseudoceros bicolor Verrill, 1901(Litvaitis et al 2010Bahia et al 2014). However, some differences are noticeable between the examined specimen and the light brown morphotype of P. bicolor: first, the orange marginal band is narrow in P. stimpsoni, but wider and diffuse in P. bicolor; although faint, in P. stimpsoni it appears as a black/grey band at both sides of the orange marginal band, while in P. bicolor a discontinuous black band appears only external to the orange one; lastly, the interruptive white speckles of the orange band are quite small in P. stimpsoni in comparison to those in P. bicolor.…”
Section: Pseudoceros Paralaticlavusmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They, too, emphasized the significance of precise documentation of colour and patterns. Litvaitis, et al (2010) tested the coloration pattern of Pseudoceros bicolor complex against molecular evidence and emerging complexities in the taxonomy of the same. Grube (1840) described the genus Thysanozoon considering the papillate dorsal surface, unlike the rest of the Cotylean genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a deep-sea specimen of Anocellidus profundus Quiroga, Bolaños and Litvaitis, 2006, from the North Pacific was also included in the analysis (specimen courtesy of Dr. Janet Voight, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, USA). For details of collection, fixation, and species identification see Litvaitis et al (2010) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%