2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02849.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When log‐dwellers meet loggers: impacts of forest fragmentation on two endemic log‐dwelling beetles in southeastern Australia

Abstract: Anthropogenic activities continue to cause massive fragmentation and reduction of forest area worldwide. With fragmentation and reduction of habitat recognized as the greatest threats to biodiversity, the implementation of improved, informed and conservation-based forestry practices is essential, and requires a greater understanding of the responses of different organisms to forest fragmentation. While genetic techniques can add invaluable insights to fragmentation studies they have rarely been employed, parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Apasis puncticeps, an Australian tenebrionid beetle dependent on decaying Eucalyptus logs, inbreeding in a local population increased with decreasing connectivity of the habitat patch (number of potential dispersal barriers between a fragment and the continuous forest; Schmuki et al 2006). Both mechanisms, i.e., small effective number of founder individuals during habitat colonisation, and restricted gene flow between habitat patches, may potentially be responsible for substantial amounts of inbreeding in both O. barnabita and P. marmorata.…”
Section: Inbreedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Apasis puncticeps, an Australian tenebrionid beetle dependent on decaying Eucalyptus logs, inbreeding in a local population increased with decreasing connectivity of the habitat patch (number of potential dispersal barriers between a fragment and the continuous forest; Schmuki et al 2006). Both mechanisms, i.e., small effective number of founder individuals during habitat colonisation, and restricted gene flow between habitat patches, may potentially be responsible for substantial amounts of inbreeding in both O. barnabita and P. marmorata.…”
Section: Inbreedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winged species would be considered to be potential dispersers over greater distances (and perhaps have other characteristics of r-strategists) than functionally flightless species, which might meet more of the criteria for K-strategists (Pianka 1970). On this basis, logs should initially harbour rapidly reproducing species with the means to disperse rapidly and over longer distances; but as decomposition progresses, rotting logs might increasingly favour slowly reproducing species for which short-distance dispersal mechanisms such as crawling are adequate (Baur et al 2005;Schmuki et al 2006). Theory would therefore suggest-and others have found (Langor et al 2008)-that the representation of flightlessness in beetle assemblages should increase with decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low capacity to establish new populations far from present ones should especially be expected for species in habitats with low temporal and high spatial variability in carrying capacity, because they are assumed to have low dispersal rates (Southwood 1962;Johnson and Gaines 1990;Nilsson and Baranowski 1997;Travis and Dytham 1999). To study dispersal of woodliving insects is difficult, but recent genetic (Schmuki et al 2006) and capture-recapture (Ranius and Hedin 2001) studies suggest limited dispersal for some species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%