2022
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.259656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When light meets biology – how the specimen affects quantitative microscopy

Abstract: Fluorescence microscopy images should not be treated as perfect representations of biology. Many factors within the biospecimen itself can drastically affect quantitative microscopy data. Whereas some sample-specific considerations, such as photobleaching and autofluorescence, are more commonly discussed, a holistic discussion of sample-related issues (which includes less-routine topics such as quenching, scattering and biological anisotropy) is required to appropriately guide life scientists through the subtl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute volume measurements are not possible from immunofluorescent material. Thus, relative comparisons between specimens require strictly comparable specimen processing, image acquisition, and image analysis [ 40 , 41 ]. Sufficient material from quiet-aged gerbils in particular was only available to us over prolonged periods of time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute volume measurements are not possible from immunofluorescent material. Thus, relative comparisons between specimens require strictly comparable specimen processing, image acquisition, and image analysis [ 40 , 41 ]. Sufficient material from quiet-aged gerbils in particular was only available to us over prolonged periods of time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems are averted if the core facility is consulted upfront, which oftentimes does not happen, either because users underestimate the complexity of the techniques and the hurdles to be taken to generate reliable results 23 or simply because the core facility's capacity may be limited to devote enough attention and resources to the project 5 . Scientists with little bioimaging experience might insufficiently consider the consequences of the suboptimal choice of equipment, instrument settings and sources of bias 24,25 . These factors influence whether an image accurately represents the biological phenomenon and the necessary workload from image acquisition to publication‐ready results.…”
Section: Part I: the Bioimage Data Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filming the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on an entire cellular system from early infection to death would greatly improve our understanding of infection sequences and dynamics, yet the efforts to obtain such knowledge are precluded by the limitations of live microscopy. The various types of fluorescence microscopy induce nonneglectable phototoxicity and molecular perturbations due to the use of chemical or genetic labeling [8][9][10][11][12][13] . This limits the capacity to observe multiple targets over hours-long periods, which is the time scale necessary to capture the cellular changes induced by SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%