2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2010.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When is multidimensional screening a convex program?

Abstract: Abstract. A principal wishes to transact business with a multidimensional distribution of agents whose preferences are known only in the aggregate. Assuming a twist (= generalized SpenceMirrlees single-crossing) hypothesis and that agents can choose only pure strategies, we identify a structural condition on the preference b(x, y) of agent type x for product type y -and on the principal's costs c(y) -which is necessary and sufficient for reducing the profit maximization problem faced by the principal to a conv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
131
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we have the following well-posedness result (existence essentially follows from [10] and uniqueness from [19]; for the sake of completeness we give a short proof).…”
Section: Existence and Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore we have the following well-posedness result (existence essentially follows from [10] and uniqueness from [19]; for the sake of completeness we give a short proof).…”
Section: Existence and Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…− b(., y(x)) is minimized at x so that if b is differentiable and u is differentiable at x (and in fact, there are well-known conditions on b which guarantee a priori that b-convex functions are differentiable at least almost everywhere, see section 3) then one obtains that ∇u(x) = ∂ x b(x, y(x)) which is a local necessary condition for (2.3) to hold. If we go one step further, as was done in the seminal work of Figalli, Kim and McCann [19], by assuming that the relation q = ∂ x b(x, y) can be inverted in the sense that q = ∂ x b(x, y) ⇐⇒ y = y b (x, q) for some map y b , then one can actually deduce y(x) from the knowledge of q(x) := ∇u(x) by the relation y(x) = y b (x, q(x)). Replacing…”
Section: The Principal-agent Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations