2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When is it OK to be drunk? Situational and cultural variations in the acceptability of visible intoxication in the UK and Norway

Abstract: The study demonstrates large situational variation in acceptability of drunken behaviour, pointing to a fine-meshed set of norms regulating alcohol use and drunken behaviour within the two cultures, with the UK standing out as a more alcohol-liberal culture than Norway. Such differences underline how norms regulating drunken behaviour are culturally constituted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the parental factors described above, perceived norms and approval of friends were closely linked to own binge drinking (Fairlie et al, 2012;Lac & Donaldson, 2016;Rulison et al, 2016). In a cross-national study, binge drinking was also rated as being most acceptable in situations involving friends (Fjaer, Pedersen, von Soest, & Gray, 2016). Moreover, social norms from multiple sources (parents, friends and schools) are likely to interact with each other -apparently creating an overall impression of normality and acceptability of alcohol use -and were found to predict adolescent binge drinking over time (Lynch, Coley, Sims, Lombardi, & Mahalik, 2015).…”
Section: Social Factors (Ii): Peersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Similar to the parental factors described above, perceived norms and approval of friends were closely linked to own binge drinking (Fairlie et al, 2012;Lac & Donaldson, 2016;Rulison et al, 2016). In a cross-national study, binge drinking was also rated as being most acceptable in situations involving friends (Fjaer, Pedersen, von Soest, & Gray, 2016). Moreover, social norms from multiple sources (parents, friends and schools) are likely to interact with each other -apparently creating an overall impression of normality and acceptability of alcohol use -and were found to predict adolescent binge drinking over time (Lynch, Coley, Sims, Lombardi, & Mahalik, 2015).…”
Section: Social Factors (Ii): Peersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In general, men drink more than women (Dodd et al, 2010; Heradstveit et al, 2019; Myrtveit, Askeland, Knudsen, et al, 2016; O'Malley & Johnston, 2002; Wechsler et al, 1995; Wicki et al, 2010), and perceived norms and peer influence concerning alcohol seem to affect male students more than females (Lo, 1995; Read et al, 2002). Also, female students tend to rate visible intoxication as less acceptable than males (Fjær et al, 2016). High-level alcohol consumption might further be more important for social relations among men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in Norway religious students have been found to be less likely to report problematic drinking (Erevik et al, 2017b). Being Christian is associated with more restrictive alcohol related norms (Fjær et al, 2016) and religious affiliation is a common reason to abstain from alcohol (Akvardar et al, 2004). Though fewer associate themselves with the established Christian church in Norway (Holberg & Brottveit, 2014; Statistics Norway), the prevalence of Islam and other religions is increasing (Statistics Norway).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The community with the lowest prevalence rate in CoFASP had a similar spirituality profile (Midwestern site), and the 2 CoFASP sites with the highest rates had the highest percentage of “unaffiliated” people/those who report no religious affiliation, who are referred to as “nones” (Rocky Mountain, 30%, and Pacific Southwest, 27%). Each of the 3 formal religions most practiced in America has historical normative orientation which encourages abstinence from alcohol, or at least moderation of use (Fjær et al, 2016; Meyers et al, 2017; Room et al, 2016). Norms emanating from a formal affiliation with an established religion promote abstinence or moderation of drinking during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%