2020
DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2020.1784986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When is fertility too low or too high? Population policy preferences of demographers around the world

Abstract: When does fertility in a country become so low or so high that a government needs to intervene? This paper sheds light on this population policy question, based on a worldwide survey among demographers. We examine how professionals' policy preferences regarding fertility levels are affected by their views on the impacts of population growth/decline and by fertility in their country of residence. The median respondent suggests intervention once fertility goes below 1.4 children or above 3.0. Three results stand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second level, we classified the outcome as binary, such that a threshold of 3 children or fewer was classified as “0” representing preference of a small family size and adolescents who preferred 4 or more children were classified as “1” representing preference of a large family size. This choice for the cut-off was informed by existing literature on determination of low or high fertility [ 38 40 ].…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second level, we classified the outcome as binary, such that a threshold of 3 children or fewer was classified as “0” representing preference of a small family size and adolescents who preferred 4 or more children were classified as “1” representing preference of a large family size. This choice for the cut-off was informed by existing literature on determination of low or high fertility [ 38 40 ].…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such widely differing population growth implications of the same level of fertility in the context of differing migration would bring very different population‐related challenges. In view of this, a “one size fits all” consensus view on “optimum” range for fertility would appear illogical (Van Dalen and Henkens 2021). Rather a “horses for courses” country and migration‐context‐specific view of the preferred national fertility level is warranted.…”
Section: Bringing a New Perspective To The Fertility Levels Of Europe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 4 For example, total fertility rates in 2018 for the USA were 1.7, 1.7 for the UK, 1.4 for Japan and only 1.1 for the Southeast Asian city-state of Singapore. 5 With an estimated replacement fertility rate of 2.1, [6][7][8] countries such as these must rely on immigration policies to maintain their current population levels.…”
Section: The Ethical Importance Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%