2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0309-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When is a goal rational?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Realistic goals are sometimes contrasted to utopian goals, portraying future states of affairs that are either known to be impossible, or highly unlikely or uncertain to be achieved (cf. Edvardsson and Hansson 2005;Baard and Edvardsson Björnberg 2015).…”
Section: Realistic Goalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Realistic goals are sometimes contrasted to utopian goals, portraying future states of affairs that are either known to be impossible, or highly unlikely or uncertain to be achieved (cf. Edvardsson and Hansson 2005;Baard and Edvardsson Björnberg 2015).…”
Section: Realistic Goalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most goal-driven practical activities can gain a lot from a critical discussion of current or proposed goals, for instance in terms of how conducive the setting of a goal is to its attainment. There are various reasons why a goal can fail to achieve its intended purpose, and some of these reasons may be suffi cient to justify that we change or give up the goal (Edvardsson and Hansson 2005 ). However, largely due to the common oversimplifi cation just referred to, the philosophy of goal-setting rationality has as yet not attracted much attention among researchers, and many basic issues remain to investigate.…”
Section: Philosophy Of Endsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in an ideal world he would certainly control himself and never even sit down on the driver's seat when he is drunk (if he is at all drunk in an ideal world). 3 Therefore, this obligation cannot be derived from information inherent in the ideal worlds. We derive it from our knowledge about subideal worlds, how they are related in terms of causality and human agency, and how we appraise them from a moral point of view.…”
Section: Fourth Argument: the Normative Relevance Of Subideal Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%