2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
223
1
27

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
2
223
1
27
Order By: Relevance
“…A few attemps have been made to study more precisely the sire effects on embryonic mortality or foetal death (FD; Humblot and Denis, 1986;Guillaume et al, 2007;Ben Jemaa et al, 2008;Druet et al, 2008). However, even in this study, the results based on sequential NRRs led to the underestimation of early pregnancy losses because of the low sensitivity of oestrous detection under farm conditions (Roelofs et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few attemps have been made to study more precisely the sire effects on embryonic mortality or foetal death (FD; Humblot and Denis, 1986;Guillaume et al, 2007;Ben Jemaa et al, 2008;Druet et al, 2008). However, even in this study, the results based on sequential NRRs led to the underestimation of early pregnancy losses because of the low sensitivity of oestrous detection under farm conditions (Roelofs et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A few attemps have been made to study more precisely the sire effects on embryonic mortality or foetal death (FD;Humblot and Denis, 1986;Guillaume et al, 2007;Ben Jemaa et al, 2008;Druet et al, 2008). However, even in this study, the results based on sequential NRRs led to the underestimation of early pregnancy losses because of the low sensitivity of oestrous detection under farm conditions (Roelofs et al, 2010).At present, by measuring the phenotypes with more precision, one can expect to improve the accuracy of the QTL/SNP detection and the identification of candidate genes.Studies aiming to investigate accurately the genetic effects on reproductive function were initially performed in experimental herds. This has been carried out using progesterone measurements to better define the interval from calving to initiation of ovarian activity (Berry et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Equations were determined to calculate the probability of each of these three oestrus expression levels associated with an ovulation. The oestrus expression level is strongly increased by the concomitant presence of at least one other cow in oestrus (Kerbrat and Disenhaus, 2004;Roelofs et al, 2010). Expression is lower for first ovulation than subsequent ovulations.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The lactation stage is a key driver of individual milk production in dairy cows, and the demography of the herd is a key driver of the herd milk production. However, in most of the current dairy herd production models, the representation of the reproductive process is usually either oversimplistic, using fixed calving to ovulation intervals or fixed cycle length of 21 days (Allore et al, 1998;Blanc et al, 2001;Blanc and Agabriel, 2008), or well out of date relative to modern dairy genotypes (Oltenacu et al, 1980;Dijkhuizen et al, 1986;Plaizier et al, 1998), where 15% to 30% of the cycles are affected by prolonged luteal phase (PLP) (Grimard and Disenhaus, 2005), duration of normal cycles has increased (Sartori et al, 2004) and oestrus expression (Kerbrat and Disenhaus, 2004;Roelofs et al, 2010) and conception rate (Lucy, 2001;Grimard et al, 2006) have strongly decreased. More recently, a dynamic simulation model was developed by Inchaisri et al (2010a) to investigate the economic consequences of reproductive -E-mail: philippe.faverdin@rennes.inra.fr performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using cow information, reproductive dynamics and economics representative for the dairy situation in the Netherlands, Inchaisri et al (2010) predicted that an improvement in the oestrus detection rate from 0.30 to 0.50 and from 0.50 to 0.70 will reduce the net economic loss by €53.29 and €11.20 per cow per year, respectively. Various oestrus detection methods aimed at improving detection rate have been developed, evaluated and compared (Diskin and Sreenan, 2000;Firk et al, 2002;Roelofs et al, 2010;Holman et al, 2011). Despite this, modern dairy farming would substantially benefit from an improved oestrus detectability via an increased expression of oestrous behaviour in cows, that is, if cows would generally show the various signs of oestrus during a longer period of time and at a higher intensity and if more cows would show standing oestrus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%