When Humans Using the IT Artifact Becomes IT Using the Human Artifact

Abstract

Following Lee & Demetis [20] who showed how systems theorizing can be conducted on the basis of a few systems principles, in this paper, we apply these principles to theorize about the systemic character of technology and investigate the role-reversal in the relationship between humans and technology. By applying systems-theoretical requirements outlined by Lee & Demetis, we examine conditions for the systemic character of technology and, based on our theoretical discussion, we argue that humans can now be considered artifacts shaped and used by the (system of) technology rather than vice versa. We argue that the role-reversal has considerable implications for the field of information systems that has thus far focused only on the use of the IT artifact by humans. We illustrate these ideas with empirical material from a well known case from the financial markets: the collapse ("Flash Crash") of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

‘Design-for-responsible’ algorithmic decision-making systems: a question of ethical judgement and human meaningful control

“…social ranking, crime prediction, and bail, parole, and criminal sentencing) have been voiced [3,6]. This rejoins Demetis and Lee's [2] words: "technology is overtaking not only human decisions and the context of their embeddedness, but also entire subsystems of society". In response to this state-of-affairs, many within AI systems community have looked towards increasingly higherpowered representational approaches to ethical decisionmaking [9].…”

“…As learning algorithms enter many areas of our daily life [2,3], the issue of ethical decision-making in face of moral dilemmas is now at the forefront of current academic and public debates [4,50,51]. Martin [4] attempts to tackle this issue across the following statement and question: as machines make more complex decisions with considerable levels of autonomy, they become more morally laden in nature-who should decide how these decisions are made?…”

“…Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are changing the workplace and the way in which we live in society [1,2]. Such technologies are not just altering human agency (ex.…”

“…Such technologies are not just altering human agency (ex. decision-making), but in many cases, subordinating it across automated algorithmic decision-making systems [2,3]. Furthermore, AI systems are increasingly being applied in making morally laden decisions [4], such as for social ranking [5], crime prediction [6], and bail, parole, and criminal sentencing [7].…”

A Design Theory for Transparency of Information Privacy Practices

“…Information systems (IS) increasingly permeate society (Yoo 2010) and evolved from tools that reflect reality to tools that shape reality (Baskerville et al 2020, Demetis andLee 2018). The rising volume of information processing throughout society, as well as the potential of IS to reshape reality, poses an increasingly serious threat to privacy as a social value (DeCew 1997) and a pillar of functioning democracies (Schwartz 1999).…”