When Green Procurement Meets Complexity: The Case of Sustainable Neighborhood Projects

Abstract

In a rapidly urbanizing world, cities form the key context for a sustainable transition. The neighborhood scale is suggested as a successful scale to realize cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. The multifaceted goals and resulting interdependencies in sustainable neighborhood (SN) developments seem to render them complex. Neighborhood scale can be understood as a program of related projects encompassing a wide range of actors interacting in a non-simple way. The added complexity comprised at the neighborhood scale challenges the promise of sustainable transition, creating a gap between what is promised as SN and what is delivered. While filling this gap is deemed pivotal to boost the performance and success of SNs, this study focuses on the practice of procurement. Green procurement has a prominent role in fostering the sustainable transition and alleviate the projects’ poor performance in energy consumption and carbon emissions. However, green procurement is complicated and often hampered by the complex nature of the programs and projects required to realize SNs. Using an in-depth case study of an ongoing SN development in Norway, we seek to explore green procurement in SN programs. The present study has several contributions. First, we provide a fresh look at SNs using the notion of program management and the principles of nearly decomposable systems. Second, the study demonstrates that green procurement can support coordination in programs, and propose several implications for purchasers to consider when devising a green procurement strategy for SN programs, laying the groundwork for new procurement research focusing on structural complexity. Furthermore, our study encourages purchasers to think like architects to grasp the various levels and make better decisions in complex projects and programs.

Sustainable innovations in Malaysia’s public procurement: strategic policy initiatives and coherences

“…It is pretty apparent that there is a strong bias towards the environmental dimension compared to other dimensions (Vörösmarty and Tátrai, 2019; Zipperer, 2019; Sönnichsen and Clement, 2020; Hamdan et al , 2021; Simanovska et al , 2021). However, decent studies have emerged that cater to social criteria in public procurement tendering (Hughes et al , 2019; Osei-Kyei et al , 2019; Vieira et al , 2020; Troje, 2021).…”

The impact of financial aspect on procurement procedures in achieving sustainable public procurement: A case of Zanzibar urban services project

“…The most straightforward justification for green procurement is a tool with which to address climate change, that it offers the broader capacity to mitigate over-exploitation of any scarce resources (Langseth & Moe, 2022). Green procurement introduces into the procurement process comparison between alternatives based on the criterion of their environmental impact (Hamdan, De Boer, & Baer, 2021). This comparison is extended to all stages of the procurement process, from the design stage to the tender evaluation and realization stages…”

Control interno en los procesos de adquisiciones y contrataciones de la Municipalidad Distrital de Huancas - 2020

“…(Holmqvist et al, 2020) Necesitando que el control interno que realice el órgano de control gubernamental de cada país debe ser cumpliendo todas las etapas preventivas y analíticas que exigen las normas actuales (Wendt et al, 2021). Esto permitirá reducir los niveles de corrupción, permitiendo a las entidades públicas alcanzar las metas trazadas hasta lograr el objetivo plasmado en el Plan Estratégico Institucional en beneficio de cada uno de sus ciudadanos (Hamdan et al, 2021).…”