The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbs004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Functional Capacity and Real-World Functioning Converge: The Role of Self-Efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is again consistent with previous questionnaire studies that found defeatist performance beliefs (Grant and Beck, 2009;Green et al, 2012), negative expectancy appraisals (Couture et al, 2011) and self-efficacy (Choi et al, 2010;Cardenas et al, 2013) were related to negative symptoms and functioning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is again consistent with previous questionnaire studies that found defeatist performance beliefs (Grant and Beck, 2009;Green et al, 2012), negative expectancy appraisals (Couture et al, 2011) and self-efficacy (Choi et al, 2010;Cardenas et al, 2013) were related to negative symptoms and functioning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The study extends this finding by demonstrating that inexperience with activities could lead to limited availability of memories of successful outcomes and, via the availability heuristic, lower expectations of success. The causal relationship between expectations and functioning could, therefore, run in the opposite direction to that assumed, but not proven, by the literature on negative performance beliefs and self-efficacy Cardenas et al, 2013). That is, the assumption that low confidence in task performance impedes motivation and action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, 'functional capacity' has recently been suggested as an independent construct, which can be assessed with separate assessment tools (Harvey et al, 2012). Functional capacity was shown to be strongly mediated by psychological characteristics such as a person's self-efficacy, defined as a person's belief that they can successfully perform a certain task (Cardenas et al, 2013). The example highlights the complexity of relationships between neurocognitive performance, real-world functional outcome, and psychosocial mediating factors, which need to be considered when conceptualizing descriptive models of illness course and outcome, as discussed later in this article.…”
Section: Withinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, negative symptoms contribute to the gap between competence and performance, 56 especially through subtle traits such as defeatist beliefs and lack of motivation. 57 It appears that the dysfunctional attitudes 56 described in cognitive theory, as well as low selfefficacy 58 and depressive symptoms, 7 also contribute negatively to the conversion of capacity into functioning.…”
Section: Functional Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%