The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When feedback signals failure but offers hope for improvement: A process model of constructive criticism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the source of criticism accounted for most of the variance in the tendency to perceive criticism as constructive compared to parental bonding measures, which were small but significant predictors, in the final model. Firstly, this finding dovetails with the process model of constructive criticism proposed by [ 105 ] where one of the main aspects for feedback to be perceived as constructive criticism was that it needed to originate from a respect-worthy source of criticism and be embedded in perceptions of care. Secondly, another possible explanation for the present finding could be that comments construed as constructive criticism are less ambiguous in terms of their definition and content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the source of criticism accounted for most of the variance in the tendency to perceive criticism as constructive compared to parental bonding measures, which were small but significant predictors, in the final model. Firstly, this finding dovetails with the process model of constructive criticism proposed by [ 105 ] where one of the main aspects for feedback to be perceived as constructive criticism was that it needed to originate from a respect-worthy source of criticism and be embedded in perceptions of care. Secondly, another possible explanation for the present finding could be that comments construed as constructive criticism are less ambiguous in terms of their definition and content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Secondly, another possible explanation for the present finding could be that comments construed as constructive criticism are less ambiguous in terms of their definition and content. According to the process model of constructive criticism, the properties for a message to be perceived as constructive criticism include being well-intentioned, appropriate targeting and provide guidance for improvement [ 105 ], which appear to suggest a specific profile for comments to be construed as constructive criticism. Another study also similarly found an overwhelming consensus across an undergraduate sample in perceptions of constructive criticism where definitions nearly always included an element of improvement, which was noted to suggest an understanding of constructive criticism messages as intending to improve performance [ 106 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating a culture where open, honest and frank feedback can be shared within a safe and collaborative environment is potentially beneficial for students (Rudolph, Raemer, and Simon 2014). Experiencing setbacks as normal parts of learning and a relationally supportive culture can help students to interpret feedback as providing a path to longer-term improvement (Fong et al 2018).…”
Section: Learning Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that self-assessment could be effective by incorporating training to acquire metacognitive skills as a learning environment design. Fong et al (2018) stated that it is important for the receiver of the assessment to trust the giver to make an effective assessment. In our scenario, the partners of peerassessment were just classmates, and it is possible that a sufficient relationship of trust could not be built over 5 weeks.…”
Section: Limitations and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%