2004
DOI: 10.1080/1479142042000180953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When facts, truth, and reality are God‐terms: on journalism's uneasy place in cultural studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
74
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Facts, truth, and reality are considered to be the 'god terms' in journalism by Zelizer (2004). The process of verification is considered to be one of the most important aspects setting apart journalism from other forms of communication, and social media poses a challenge for verification.…”
Section: Trust In Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facts, truth, and reality are considered to be the 'god terms' in journalism by Zelizer (2004). The process of verification is considered to be one of the most important aspects setting apart journalism from other forms of communication, and social media poses a challenge for verification.…”
Section: Trust In Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The familiar and widespread allergic response towards cultural studies (or any other theory) by professional journalism educators has had a negative effect on the academic advancement of the field (Zelizer, 2004), but at the same time journalism courses in universities are increasingly popular as skills-based information management and writing programmes, whose graduates may have no ambition to work in professional newsroom practice. Future research in the field might want to investigate the extension of journalistic capabilities into popular culture (and vice versa) via such training schemes, along with impact of anti-expert DIY formats from blogs to YouTube.…”
Section: Plus çA Change?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Media scholars, especially those who occupy themselves with the study and teaching of journalism, often attest to the difficulties in bridging the gap between academy and praxis (cf. Tomaselli & Caldwell, 2002;Zelizer, 2004aZelizer, , 2004b. In the case of this study, all interviewees were told from the start that the focus of the study was specifically on the critique levelled against foreign coverage and the ways in which foreign correspondents both carry out their practice and how they frame stories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%